我在2014年8月4日向法院提交了我为新加坡人民争取公积金的宣誓书,新加坡的主流媒体不给予报道。

I Filed My Affidavit for the Court Case to Fight for Singaporeans’ CPF and the Mainstream Media Did Not Report On It!

假设您是主持和支持正义的,请为广泛的传递帮我的这份宣誓书。

Please share this article far and wide, if you want justice. 

哇!我在昨天递交了我被李显龙起诉诽谤案件的宣誓书。我在这份宣誓书里附录了证据说明政府和GIC管理新加坡人民的公积金差异。

Wow. I filed my affidavit for the defamation suit by Lee Hsien Loong yesterday, with evidence on the discrepancies in how the government and the GIC manages the CPF of Singaporeans.

尽管如此,没有一家主流媒体报道愿意这则新闻。以我的这个时候和年龄,我无法相信新加坡的主流媒体对这则关于新加坡人民的公积金问题的新闻采取了靠边站的立场。

However, none of the mainstream media reported on it. In this time and age, I cannot believe that the mainstream media in Singapore would sideline such an important piece of news about Singaporeans’ CPF!

我的同胞们,假设您要知道自己的公积金是如何被动用的情况,现在是由您自己决定的时候了。假设您要为您公积金做些事情和要政府告诉您有关我们的公积金的真相,那就请您把这份宣誓书广泛的传递出去。主流媒体事实绝对不会主动去做这件事的。主流媒体不会去干他们应该干的事——那就是:报道新闻。这是不是您的任务和责任把这份宣誓书广泛的传递开去——由您自己决定。假设您要知道您的公积金事实上是发生了什么事,请通过社交网络(面书、推特、邮件等)和其他您可能拥有的聊天网络把这份宣誓书传递出去。只有通过这样广泛的传递,我们才有可能让有关我们的公积金的事实真相露出水面。

My fellow Singaporeans, if you want answers to how your CPF is being used, it is up to you now. If you want something to be done to your CPF and for the government to tell you the truth, then please share this article far and wide. The mainstream media won’t do it. They won’t do what they should do – report the news. It is now up to you – it is your duty and responsibility – to share this article if you want to know the truth of what is really happening to your CPF. Share it via Facebook, Twitter, email, WhatsApp, or any other chat apps that you have. Share it. Only then when the truth come out.

我在我的宣誓书里列举了5个主要的证据。这里向大家摘要的说明。

I revealed 5 key evidences in my affidavit. Here is a very quick look at what they are here.

一、政府在过去狡辩说,他们没有动用我们的公积金投资在GIC。但是,他们在今年6月他们终于承认了.

(1) The Government Claimed in the Past that They Do Not Take Our CPF to Invest in GIC, But Finally Admits to the Truth for the First Time in June This Year

今年6月份之前,GIC狡辩说,他们不知道自己是在动用我们的公积金进行投资,那是因为政府没有‘明确的’告诉他们。

Before June this year, the GIC claimed that they do not know if they use our CPF funds to invest because it is “not made explicit” to them by the government.

photo 2 (17)

事实上,政府也狡辩说,他们并没有动用我们的公积金投资在GIC。政府的这些话在过去15年里最少重覆了三次。

In fact, the government also claims that they do not take our CPF to invest in the GIC, and they did this on at least 3 counts over the past 15 years.

在2007年,当时的人力部长黄永宏也是声称GIC并没有动用来自公积金的资金进行投资。

In 2007, then-Manpower Minister Ng Eng Hen also claimed that the GIC does not “use money derived from CPF to invest”.

lowtk-20070920

Chart: Worker’s Party Singapore News

在2006年,当时担任资政和GIC的主席的李光耀也是这么说,‘在GIC的投资回报率和公积金户头的利息之间并没有任何的联系。’

In 2006, then-Minister Mentor and Chairman of the GIC also said that, “there is no connection between GIC’s rate of return and the interest paid on CPF accounts”.

Screenshot (49)

在2001年,当时担任资政和GIC的主席的李光耀也是说,‘GIC和公积金之间并没有直接的联系关系。’

In 2001, then-Senior Minister and also GIC Chairman Lee Kuan Yew also said that, “there is no direct link between the GIC and the CPF”.

Screenshot (45)

尽管如此,在今年6月份,在新加坡的历史上第一次,新加坡政府‘完全改变了他们的位置’!他们承认了这个事实——他们是动用过公积金投资在GIC。

However, in June this year, for the first time ever in Singapore’s history, the government “volte-faced on their position” and admitted the truth – that they do take our CPF to invest in the GIC.

CPF How It Works cropped

二、政府删除了网站上有关他们如何动用公积金投资在GIC和淡马锡控股的信息证据

(2) The Government Deleted Evidence of How Our CPF is Invested in GIC and Temasek Holdings

在2012年和2013年,我写了2篇文章。这是我特意到特定的政府网站找出来的资料。这些资料显示了政府事实上是如何动用我们的公积金投资在GIC和淡马锡控股。

In 2012 and 2013, I had written two articles that traced specifically on the government websites, which showed how the government indeed takes our CPF to invest in the GIC and Temasek Holdings.

Where Does Your CPF Go

无论如何,在今年5月份,政府已经删除了所有这些有关的信息痕迹的全部证据了。他们删除了有关我们的公积金(通过政府债券SSGS)投资在‘储备’的笼子里。

However, by May this year, the government deleted all traces of the evidence. They deleted information on how our CPF (via the SSGS) is invested “in reserves”.

Slide1

同时,他们也删除了有关金融管理局(MAS)、GIC和淡马锡控股是管理我们的公积金的信息证据。

They also deleted evidence on how our CPF (via the reserves) is managed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), GIC and Temasek Holdings.

Removed reserves managed by

但是,在今的6月份。政府承认了所有的事实,包括了他们确实是动用了我们的公积金投资在GIC。他们删除了所有的信息资料目的是要掩盖的这些事情的痕迹。然而,在今年6月,他们已经别无选择的必须承认这些事实!

But by June this year, the government admitted to everything, and admitted that they do take our CPF to invest in the GIC. They deleted everything to cover their tracks, but by June this year, they had no choice but to admit to the truth.

CPF How It Works The Straits Times

三、淡马锡控股狡辩说,它们并没有动用我们的公积金去投资!但是,事实上它们已经这么做了!——他们是否会归还我们的公积金?

(3) Temasek Holdings Claim that It Does Not Use Our CPF to Invest but It Did – Were Our Monies Returned?

在今年6月份,淡马锡控股有史以来第一次狡辩说,它们‘没有投资在我们的公积金或管理公积金的储蓄。’

In June this year, for the first time ever, Temasek Holdings claim that they do not “invest or manage CPF savings”.

Temasek doesn't invest or manage CPF savings

淡马锡控股也在的网站狡辩说,

Temasek Holdings also makes this claim on their website.

FAQs - About Temasek - Temasek

副总理将财政部长善达曼也狡辩说,‘淡马锡控股从来就没有管理过公积金的资金’。

The Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam also claims that Temasek Holdings, “has never managed CPF funds”.

Screenshot (89)

善达曼说, 淡马锡控股的起步资金是在成立初期,政府从资产中转拨了大约40亿的资产值作为公司成立的资本金。

Mr Tharman said that, “Temasek started off with a set of assets which were transferred by the Government at time of inception… (of) about $400 million dollars worth of assets in the form of a set of companies.”

Screenshot (90)

无论如何,1982年当时的劳工兼交通部长在一次讲话中披露了说,‘公积金的储蓄是占了新加坡国家储蓄额的一个巨大部分。这笔储蓄资金以集资方式主要用于建造工厂、安装新厂房和设备,扩充基础建设,例如道路、港口码头和通讯以及建造住房等等。’

However, it is revealed in a speech given by the Minister for Labour and Communications in 1982 that, “CPF savings form a large portion of Singapore’s savings. These savings are used for capital formation which means the construction of new factories, installation of new plant and equipment, expansion of infrastructure such as roads,’ ports and telecommunications, the building of houses and so on.”

Screenshot (91)

这就是说,事实上我们的公积金是转入淡马锡控股。但是,政府在这些企业私营从中赚取了利润后,是否有将这些被动用的公积金归还会到我们的公积金户头?

Which means that our CPF was indeed transferred into Temasek Holdings, but did the government return to Singaporeans our CPF returned when these companies were privatised and returns were earned?

新加坡政府说淡马锡控股没有用新加坡人的公积金去进行投资

四、今天,GIC和淡马锡控股在世界财富主权基金的排名是第8和第10位。但是,新加坡人是世界上拥有最穷的退休金的国家之一。

(4) Today, GIC and Temasek Holdings are the 8th and 10th Richest Sovereign Wealth Funds in the World, But Singaporeans Have One of The Poorest Retirement Funds in the World

今天,GIC和淡马锡控股在世界财富主权基金的排名是第8和第10位。

Today, GIC and Temasek Holdings are the 8th and 10th largest sovereign wealth funds in the world.

Sovereign Wealth Fund Rankings   Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute

根据亚洲发展银行研究所披露,新加坡是亚洲国家里最少退休金的国家之一。

But Singaporeans have one of the least adequate retirement funds in Asia, according to the Asian Development Bank Institute.

Slide52

根据墨尔本Melbourne Mercer Global Pension Index 2013.指数披露,我们新加坡人也是世界上高收入国家里拥有最少退休金的国家,

We also have the least adequate retirement funds among the highest-income countries, according to the Melbourne Mercer Global Pension Index 2013.

Slide53

根据OECD披露,新加坡人同时也是世界上退休金不足的国家。

Singaporeans also have the least adequate retirement funds in the world, according to the OECD.

Slide54

假设是这样,我在宣誓书里这么写着,‘我的观点是:这里有些不对劲,因为有些事实没有加入。为什么GIC和淡马锡控股是世界上其中最大的主权财富基金之一,但是,新加坡人却是是世界上最少退休金的国家之一。特别是,当GIC和淡马锡控股(根据GIC在那个时候)是在管理着我们的公积金的钱?’

If so, I had said in my affidavit that, “My point was that something was not adding up. Why was it that GIC and Temasek Holdings were amongst the biggest sovereign wealth funds in the world and yet Singaporeans had one of the least adequate retirement funds in the world? Especially so when GIC and Temasek Holdings (according to the GIC at that time) were managing CPF monies?”

五、政府狡辩说,政府没有干预GIC的运作。但是,实际上是政府就是在GIC董事会里面。

(5) The Government Claims that the Government Does Not Interfere in the GIC, But the Government is the GIC

最终,政府狡辩说,‘GIC向政府承担组合投资的业绩表现的责任。但是,政府没有干预GIC的投资决策。’

Finally, the GIC claims that, “The government holds the GIC board accountable for portfolio performance, but does not interfere in the company’s investment decisions.”

Screenshot (85)

政府也狡辩说,‘GIC、金融管理局和淡马锡控股在决策投资项目方面,政府没有扮演任何角色。在GIC和金融管理局的董事会里包括了部长,这些投资决策完全是由他们各自的管理团队自己承担责任的。’

The government also claims that, “The Government plays no role in decisions on individual investments that are made by GIC, MAS and Temasek. At the GIC and MAS, whose boards include Ministers, these investment decisions are entirely the responsibility of their respective management teams.”

Ministry of Finance - Section I  What comprises the reserves and who manages them

无论如何,我在宣誓书里说,‘这是难于置信的事。政府的领导人总理、2位副总理和贸工部长和教育部长,同时也是GIC董事会的董事情况下,这是不可能说政府不会“不论直接或影响公司的决策的”。’

However, I said in my affidavit that, “this is implausible as the head of the Government, the Prime Minister, the two deputy prime ministers and the ministers for Trade and Industry and Education also head GIC as its Board of Directors. It is clearly impossible that the Government “neither directs nor influences the company’s decisions”.

事实上,那些在GIC董事会 的董事是:

Indeed, these are who are on the Board of Directors of GIC:

Screenshot (50)

Screenshot (51)

和那些在政府内阁的成员是同一班人马。

And these are the people in the government Cabinet. These are the same people.

Screenshot (69)

Screenshot (71)

Screenshot (74)

GIC同时也说,‘GIC管理层每年按例与财政部长举行一次工作汇报会议。’

GIC also says that, “Once a year, the GIC Management formally meets the Minister for Finance”

Screenshot (92)

但是,财政部长就是GIC董事会的董事。这岂不是成了违反自觉了吗?

But the Finance Minister is also on the GIC Board of Directors so “such a claim is counterintuitive”.

Screenshot (66)

最终,GIC狡辩说,‘GIC是一家政府全资的私营企业。财政部长代表政府确保董事会 委任的董事是胜任的;GIC协助建议推荐适合人选。’

Finally, the GIC says that, “GIC is a private limited company wholly owned by the government. The Ministry of Finance, representing the government, ensures that a competent board of directors is in place; GIC helps by suggesting qualified candidates.”

因此,我在宣誓书里清楚的说明,‘这非常清楚是利益冲突的。政府和GIC之间如何确保自己不会走向错误的方向进而误导了新加坡人民。当政府自我推荐人选进入GIC董事会,这个遴选的过程本身就不是透明的,或者让新加坡人民所知道的。这个遴选过程和人选的品质就理所当然要受到质疑。’

However, I make clear in my affidavit that, “There is a clear conflict of interest in how the Government and GIC continues to present itself in a mischievous way and to mislead Singaporeans… When the Government appoints itself onto the Board of Directors, and where the selection process is not transparent or made known to Singaporeans, the selection process and the quality of the candidates become doubtful.”

政府狡辩说,GIC‘不需要理会资金的来源’。‘这是极其非常不可能的、不可置信的和荒缪的。’总理和财政部长所承担的任务是相同的。他们是负责全面管理新加坡的财政事务,他们同时是在GIC董事会担任董事。这是不合逻辑和不可能的事说,GIC董事会‘投资资产时,不会理会政府的资金来源’。但是,GIC的董事会凭借他们在政府的地位,他们是绝对知道政府的资金来源的’。这是我在宣誓书里所说。

For the government to claim that the GIC “pays no regard to what the source of funds is”, “is clearly impossible, unbelievable and absurd since the Government, and the Prime Minister and Finance Minister no less, who are tasked to be in charge of the overall financial matters of Singapore, is also on the GIC Board of Directors. It is illogical and impossible that the GIC Board of Directors “invests the assets … without regard to the sources of the Government’s funds” when the GIC Board of Directors, by virtue of their positions in Government, would know exactly what the sources of the Government’s funds are,” I said in my affidavit.

政府说在把人民的生活置于风险中和政府如何管理我们的公积金是一个涉及我们的安全的威胁

The Government is Putting Singaporeans’ Lives at Risk and How the Government Manages Our CPF is a Threat to Our Security

最后,我说,‘我再次清楚的指出,假设我被指控有任何侵犯的指责(我否认),某些实体的利益是通过人民的资金中取得的话,这个指控是针对政府、GIC和淡马锡控股。那是因为他们在动用了新加坡人的公积金进行投资取得巨额利润后没有全额归还给新加坡人民 。’

Finally, I said that, “I make clear here that if there has been any allegation of misappropriation by me (which is denied) that certain entities might profit from the peoples’ funds that that allegation is against the Government, GIC and Temasek Holdings, as they do not return to Singaporeans the full amount of investment gains made from investing Singaporeans CPF monies.

或许是当我写这篇文章要求透明化时,有人在管理着公积金的钱。这是完全毫无基本依据说我指责原告是挪用的新加坡人的公积金的犯罪行为。我并没有指责他从新加坡的户头里拿走任何一分钱。我也没有这个意思去作这样的指责。这只是一个人自己渴望丑闻的想法。这就是我在这篇文章所要表达的意思。

Neither were they at the time I wrote the Article transparent as to who was managing CPF monies.  There is absolutely no basis whatsoever to say that I have accused the Plaintiff of Criminal Misappropriation of Singaporeans CPF monies.  I have never accused him of taking a cent of Singaporeans CPF monies and I have no intention to do so as well.  It is only persons who are avid for scandal who would say I meant this in the Article.”

在总结时,我是这么说的:

In summary, I had said:

显然的,这是非常清楚的。GIC知道在这些资金的来源和他们就是在动用公共基金。但是,在他们知道这件事已经引起关注了,GIC就更换了这个信息。因此,这就是证明GIC和淡马锡控股是动用了公共的基金和新加坡人的公积金去进行投资。淡马锡控股为了不需要透露他们的实体营业经营状况,而将这个实体改为私人企业是极其荒缪的。GIC巨额的基金事实上就是来自新加坡人的公积金,他们把这两个实体伪装成两个不同的实体。他们和他们的董事会和政府都必须全面透明化和获得新加坡人民信任的。政府让GIC和淡马锡控股缺乏透明化和可信任度的情况下是完全不可以接受和虚伪的。这是把新加坡人的生活置于风险中。我相信,我是具有为这起案件进行辩护的权利,因为我的文章没有抵触到法律足于支持原告的律师对我的指控。

Evidently, it is clear that GIC knew where the funds were coming from and that the funds used by them are public funds, but after their knowledge of this was highlighted, GIC changed this information. Thus since it is evident that GIC and Temasek Holdings use public funds and Singaporeans’ CPF monies to invest, it is absurd that GIC and Temasek Holdings are made private limited entities which are not required to disclose full information. GIC and Temasek Holdings use public funds and should not be made private limited companies. Also, a significant pool of GIC’s funds actually do come from Singaporeans’ CPF and it is disingenuous for the Government to delink the two. They and their Board of Directors and the Government have to be fully transparent and accountable to the citizens of Singapore. The lack of transparency and accountability at this level at GIC and Temasek Holdings and by the government is completely unacceptable and disingenuous, and puts the lives of the citizens of Singapore at risk.I believe that I have a defence to these proceedings as the Article does not in law, bear out the meaning which the Plaintiff solicitors claim it does.

同时,我在上述所说的事实上非常清楚证实了GIC、淡马锡控股和政府在管理公共基金和新加坡人的公积金上是缺乏透明度和可行性度的。为了让本案能够进行充分的辩论,进行一场公开的讯问这起案件是极其重要的。

Also, as the above clearly bears out, there is a clear case of a lack of transparency and accountability on how GIC, Temasek Holdings and the Government manages public funds and Singaporeans’ CPF monies, and in order for this case to be adequately argued, an open enquiry on this issue is of utmost importance.

政府和GIC已经无数次的改变他们的说法和人民的立场也慌乱了。这显示了他们隐蔽了关于政府和GIC管理新加坡人的公积金的重要事实。如果是继续以这样的方式管理新加坡人的公积金的话,这是不诚实和对安全是一个威胁的。政府和GIC相互矛盾的声明和回答是给新加坡人民的生活造成实质性的风险。由于GIC和淡马锡控股是属于‘私人有限公司性质的企业’,这是缺乏管理公积金的经验的。这两家企业从成立开始运营没有公布完整的年报,由于政府同时也是GIC董事会而造成利益上的冲突,进而产生了管理新加坡人的公积金的诚信问题。以及新加坡人是否信任政府和GIC继续扮演这种单方面和不透明化以及缺乏责任性的态度。

The Government and the GIC has made numerous changes and flip-flops in their stance, which has been shown to conceal important facts about how the Government and the GIC manages Singaporeans’ CPF. This is disingenuous and remains a threat to the security of how Singaporeans’ CPF are being managed. The Government’s and the GIC’s inconsistencies in their statements and answers pose real risk to the lives of Singaporeans, whom lack of knowledge of how the CPF is being managed, due to the “private limited” nature of the GIC and Temasek Holdings。due to the lack of full annual records of these companies since inception, and due to the conflict of interest posed by the Government also being on the GIC and questions the integrity of how Singaporeans’ CPF is being managed and whether Singaporeans can trust the Government and the GIC to continue to perform in such an unilaterally-non-transparent and accountable manner.

以上就是我的律师会将在法院提出异议。 我将会交给我的律师去为我进行法律上的辩论。法院将裁定这些文字的字句的法律定义。我的良知是清晰的。我一直坚信为我们的国家、为新加坡和新加坡人民朝向一个伟大美好的前途而努力。

These are legal matters for my lawyers to argue in Court and I will leave it to my lawyers to make the legal arguments and for the Court to decide on the legal meaning of the words.”

My conscience is clear and I have always believed in working towards the greater good of our country and for Singapore and Singaporeans.

我一直有个愿望,这个国家拥有一个诚实和透明化的政府和健全的政府结构(例如:公务员机关、公民社会、智囊团、媒体、教育学院等等)是属于独立的与政府之外的。这样就可以清晰、坚强的监督和平衡各方面的问题,以确保缺乏透明度和责任感的发生。这样新加坡人的生活就可以改进和受到保护。

It has always been my wish that when we have a Government which is honest and transparent and estates of governance (i.e. civil service, civil society, think tanks, media, educational institutions etc) are independent of the Government and of one another, will there be clear and strong checks and balances which will prevent such a lack of transparency and accountability from happening, and where the lives of Singaporeans will improve and be protected.

新加坡人民现在正处于一个遭受被人侵害的处境。这是由于他们无法从政府、金融管理局、GIC和淡马锡控股哪儿得到信息!由于对政府的公务员管理制度的检查和平衡的机制造成这样的侵害是不忠实的。我们需要把全面检查问题的主动权掌握在自己的手上。只有这些问题得到严格的处理和向新加坡人民承担责任的情况下,新加坡人民的生活才会真正的受到保护。这就是我一直以来怀着良好的愿望所写的文章。这是我一直以来坚持朝向一个正义和平等的新加坡社会的愿望。

The current situation where Singaporeans have been placed at a disservice, due to the lack of information from the Government, MAS, GIC and Temasek Holdings, is due to a lack of checks and balances within the Government and among the estates of governance. Such disservice is dishonourable and requires a thorough examination of the issues at hand. Only when these issues are dealt with rigourously and held accountable to Singaporeans where where the lives of Singaporeans will be truly safeguarded. This is where I have written in good faith from, and which I maintain, towards a just and equal Singaporean society.

假设您要正义付诸实践,请把这份宣誓书广泛传递出去。政府是不会让您知道事实真相的。但是,当越来越多人知道事实真相后,我们将有可能回击他们!让他们把事实真相公诸于世。请帮忙把这份文件广泛传递开去。

If you want justice done, please share this article far and wide. They won’t let us know, but only when we let more people know, will we be able to fight back and let the truth be known. Please share this article.

您如果要阅读我的宣誓书全文可以到以下网址浏览。我的宣誓书全文是共18页,其余的是附件。

To read the full affidavit, you can refer to the link below. You can read the affidavit in the first 18 pages. The rest of the pages are annexes.

鄞义林递交给李显龙8月4日的宣誓书网址:

Roy Ngerng Affidavit to Lee Hsien Loong 4 August 2014

第三场《归还我们的公积金》集会

3rd Edition Of The #ReturnOurCPF Event

我们将在2013年8月23日举行第三场《归还我们的公积金》集会。

On 23 August, there will be a third edition of the #ReturnOurCPF event.

让我们大家团结在一起参与这场集会。政府不可以在动用了新加坡人民的公积金,然后,告诉新加坡人民他们不知道正在动用我们的公积金。这是在欺哄新加坡人民和光天化日下抢劫!

Join us at the third edition and take a stand. The government cannot take Singaporeans’ CPF to use and tell us that they do not know what they are using it for. This is a derision to Singaporeans and daylight robbery!

让我们在2014年9月23日见面。为实现一个更美好的生活和我们的孩子,让我们走到一起,团结起来发出要求改变的共同呼声!

On 23 August, we will see you at Hong Lim Park. Let’s come together, be united and speak for change, for the better for our lives, and our children’s.

您看到以下的网站流量有关这场集会的详情

You can join the Facebook event page here.

与此同时,我的第一场诽谤案件将于2014年9月18日早上10点整开庭审讯。这是一个全天的审讯。

Also, my first court case will be held on 18 September 2014, at 10.00am. It will be a full-day hearing.

Return Our CPF 3 Poster Template with Text edited with Title@Chinese

Return Our CPF 3 Poster Template with Text with Title

Advertisements

7 comments

  1. Pingback: 为了正义与公义,请协助广泛传递这份主流媒体不愿意报道的新闻! | 人民论坛
  2. Telescope

    1. Mainstream newspapers did not report?

    Singaporean can buy all the company’s email addresses database CD, recommended to use this software to email all citizens

    2. Someone altered the original description ?
    If before the hearing , anyone erased from the original paper, of course, eraser side is wrong, but the computer has screenshot function, made screenshots down before they erased, Fox’s tail was caught.

    3.Common sense, when a country’s incumbent prime minister, is not suitable under the premise without first multifaceted communication, reform, explanation to sue an unemployed person, Because the power of the Prime Minister’s higher than the unemployed, In this extremely unequal before the law under the circumstances,Prime is more than suspected, but direct abuse (including the use of taxpayers’ money).Do not know 63-year-old prime minister whether realize that there is no telling process, in fact, is again corruption, disgrace facial process.

    4. Under the spotlight, dealing with the case aroused public indignation, is a big trouble given to the judge by prime minister.Because have to start the investigation from the initial capital of Temasek where an account is credited ,In the end it has no association with the CPF? This is the key to this case.

    1。 主流报纸不报道 ?

    新加坡可以买到全部公司电邮地址的database CD,建议用这个软件一次性发出去。

    2。 有人涂改原件 ?

    在开庭之前涂涂改改,当然是涂改一方的错, 不过电脑有截屏功能, 在有人涂改以前, 都被截下来了, 狐狸尾巴被抓住了。

    3。 一般常识,一个国家的总理在位时,是不适合在没有首先进行多方面沟通,改进,解释的前提下, 控告一个失业的人,因为总理的权力高于这位无业者,在这样法律面前极其不对等的情况下,总理不止是涉嫌, 而是直接滥用职权 ( 包括使用纳税人的钱 )。 不知道63岁的总理认识到没有,告诉的过程,其实是再次腐败, 丢尽颜面的过程。

    4。 在聚光灯下,处理一个民愤极大的老话题, 是新加坡法官面临的一个麻烦。因为要从淡马锡控股最初原始资本是从哪一个户口进账开始查, 到底它与CPF有没有关联 ?这才是这个告诉案的关键。

  3. supporter

    after the courts, potential disaster still exists, jobless still the top priority, cpf owner still accused Temasek , urge the prime minister resign , labor union’s the protection law for workers ,especially those in power accused workers, prohibit the power person use the public funds for his own case, our next Prime Minister’s salary must not exceed the President of USA, Temasek profit should share with the people, etc.

  4. Robert Wee Joo Guan

    Dear Roy, While many have contributed to your defence fund many are also awaiting your update.U have indicated that u would so do….regards

  5. Pingback: [漫画]新加坡人是如何被哄和被套牢的 | The Heart Truths
  6. teoenming

    Singapore Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew and Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong Want Teo En Ming Dead

    Singapore Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew and Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong want Teo En Ming dead. Lee Kuan Yew and Lee Hsien Loong want Teo En Ming to die young. I am only 36 years old. I do not want to die young. I want to live to a hundred years old and beyond!!! I want to live to a hundred years old and beyond!!! I want to live to a hundred years old and beyond!!! I want to live to a hundred years old and beyond!!! I want to live to a hundred years old and beyond!!!

    In fact, I want to live forever!!!
    In fact, I want to live forever!!!
    In fact, I want to live forever!!!
    In fact, I want to live forever!!!
    In fact, I want to live forever!!!

    Teo En Ming has filed an official complaint against the Singapore Government at the United Nations Human Rights Council Branch and the International Criminal Court. Read the letter here:

    ***********************************************************************************
    ***********************************************************************************
    ***********************************************************************************
    ***********************************************************************************
    ***********************************************************************************
    ***********************************************************************************

    Teo En Ming’s Open Letter (Plea for Medical Help/Assistance) to World Leaders dated 27 Aug 2010. Read the letter here:

    http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/mpich-discuss/2010-August/007811.html

    Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
    Singapore Citizen
    Republic of Singapore
    14 Jan 2015 Wednesday Singapore Time

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s