[POLL] What Do You Think of the PAP?

Afternote: This survey has been corrupted since Monday November 17. Mystery respondents were sent to skew the responses and thwart the objectivity of the survey. I will be doing an analysis on the results at a later date to showcase the actual results prior to this attack.

Advertisements

69 comments

  1. John

    We need a more caring government whose priority is not making more & more money at the expense of the common citizen due higher cost of everything and added cost to sustain their GRC system in order to be in control.
    I would wish a future government or a balance parliamentary system where the voice of the majority are listen to and acted on.
    There must be greater democracy in our society and freedom of speech should be the prerogative else there is democracy and no check on a government.
    This is my hope for Singapore and for the younger generation of Singaporean.

    • Tan Ku Ku

      You want a caring government or you want a PAP government?
      You have to choose.
      A caring PAP government is not possible.
      For more information, please refer to the book “Hard Truths” by Lee Kuan Yew.
      Is the above true?
      What do you think?

  2. Wolaiye

    Not a good idea to do such an Internet poll. PAP IBs will swarm you and give you skewed results. That’s what Redbean has found out.

    • RED_man

      Of course it is not truth, because PAP will redraw the boundary line to win on the day of the election. There is also people like you who stupid enough to vote them.

  3. An open letter to Supreme Court of Singapore,

    Several questions to the Singapore judiciary

    An open letter to Supreme Court of Singapore, The Honourable the Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon
    Judge of Appeal Justice Chao Hick Tin
    Judge of Appeal Justice Andrew Phang Boon Leong
    Justice Judith Prakash, Justice Choo Han Teck, Justice Belinda Ang Saw Ean
    Justice Woo Bih Li, Justice Tay Yong Kwang , Justice Lee Seiu Kin , Justice Chan Seng

    Dear Sir
    First
    1)
    what is the definition of libel? The legal description refers to the use of violence or other means, deliberately fabricated and spread fictitious facts.

    2)

    Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited ‘s initial set up capital was the major contribution from the fund of CPF, CPF is a pension of Singapore common people . that fact is fiction ? Or the defendant intentionally fabricated it ?

    3)

    If it is not fiction, nor fabricated, then libel not established;
    Find out the truth, the key to audit Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited .

    Once again for those so-called ” implied “, try to figure out other psychological activities, are not libel case basis.

    Is nonsense .

    The second

    1)

    The world’s farthest distance is not from the Earth to the Moon , but a judge from common people of Singapore. the Libel fines started from 250,000.00 SGD ? for the poorer class, it makes the suddenly law become a sounding Mafia judge.

    The third point

    1)

    let us look at the status quo, according to the plaintiff if the wish fulfilled libel case, then may we ask that what is the injuries for the plaintiff’s there?

    from last a few months We have seen every day the plaintiff still happy, sightseeing tour every month, eating delicacies, drinking bird’s nest. Shows the plaintiff simply innocuous.

    2)

    Similarly, we have seen the defendant Roy’s family has been threatened every day, they fear, much suffering after jobless, did not sleep well for a single night, he even did not own a decent dress for himself. worried that 50 years ago our ancestors suffered the White Terror is back again, don’t know in the next day dead or alive omen enveloped the people atrium

    3)

    If you judge and Lee Kuan Yew family no superior-subordinate relationship, why persecuting the young guy the very same as persecuting Tang Liang Hong , exactly the same ton of bricks ?

    The fourth point

    1)

    As an independent judge, you witness the defendant and his family suffered by a series of “punishment”, and still show Indifferent , you are not only deviates significantly from the judicial basis of the track, that is the legal basis of the truth. And contrary to the axiom of human co-existence. with a legal hat, staged a brutally spirit rapes towards the common people of Singapore

    And thus come to an important legal aphorism: “No person shall benefit from its mistakes, or harm others.”

    2)

    Ladies and gentlemen, in the misappropriation of people’s pension CPF into set up capital fund in
    Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited, this is an indisputable fact .

    The judgment of libel was established , not only the loss of evidence-based principles of law, and black and white reversed, deprivation the purpose of public welfare, so that the current laws of Singapore and its public morality effect disappear .

    3)

    Tilted to the plaintiff to deal with cases, but it must be within the law permitted magnitude , but we please asking you, in the fact of Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited ‘s set up capital fund was come from people’s pension accout , how to cover up the magnitude of this , Mr.Judge ?

    and you and the plaintiff in private exchanges, such a problem is not illegal, but involved an unethical judges. apparently “invisible power ” who behind the door of Court hurt innocent people. Leads to social differentiation. And the judge your own mental defects are closely related.

    Fifth

    In current extremely difficult moment , Singapore law should be the last bulwark for social justice. Now, we come together to do the following analysis:

    1)

    Singapore common people handed over their 36% of monthly salary to the pension ” money keeper “,

    the ” money keeper ” may keep updating with the owner. or the owner ask their ” money keeper ” for updating, both way are makes sense, nothing to do with sin or libel .

    2)

    For that rich people, the impact is less than what the pension. Down and out on the very poor people, the pension is their life.

    People suffering 36 percent of the monthly salary to pay out, years by years only left a few rags, a pair of shoes, live frugally, they living in hunger, no decent dress, but they were told the 55-year-old will not get back the pension, in desperation, people began to question the government, but no respond .

    3)

    Therefore, people wrote in his blog asked God, asked the Buddha, asked for Mercy, this it nothing to do with sin or libel .

    People are innocent. Roy Ngerng Yi Ling is innocent. the pension’s owner is innocent

    4)

    the guilty party is the one who try to frame Roy , because his wife is the boss of Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited. therefore he implemented a series of political persecution against the blog writer.

    The sixth point

    1)

    We ask the judge, you read about long than 39 pages long judgment, is waste of national resources, the intention to rewrite the rule of Singapore law to become a family’s practice lynching.

    you even ordered and prohibit the common people ask Heaven for their pension ? prohibit ask God ? You are not the human being, you want people to against Gods ?

    This is anviolation of the laws of science.

    So that judges, Singapore law in front of the power was shows a completely impotence.

    You have not only lost the respect for the law, but also the loss of self-esteem. And if a judge without dignity, leading the public to lose confidence in the whole society, directly threating the integrity of the foundation of Singapore.

    2)

    Step back a thousand that before audit Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited, libel is not established.

    As we all know, Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited is an venture capital fund from the contribution of pension CPF, NOW who made it secretive ? why stop people ask ?

    3)

    While the PM current declared delay to 10 years later return people’s pension, the postpone return is due to Temasek Holdings Pte Ltd in the United States lost $ 40 billion ‘s sequelae.

    Will Singapore law based on the fact ?
    based on the partially CPF transferred to Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited ?
    Or based on the Plaintiff’s psychological activity ?

    Please consider the following evidence

    once again, what is libel and what is the definition of libel? Legal description refers to the use of violence or other means, deliberately fabricated and spread fictitious facts.

    4)

    However Temasek Holdings Pte Ltd’s initial set up capital contribution from the fund of CPF, and that fact is not fiction . no one intentionally fabricated it , Include the defendant.

    So, libel simply not established .

    The seventh point

    1)

    Here it is necessary with everybody to share a folk tale:

    The owner has hundred ounce gold, he buried it under the ground, and put a note on the ground ” here no gold”

    his neighbor stole the gold, but also left a note wrote: “The next-door neighbor did not steal the gold.”

    This means that they are guilty, so they always make a statement. This the same example and someone put pressure on the judge , issued a statement the same meaning.

    2)

    ” where is your CPF going to ?”, for this question, innocent people do not need explain

    Plaintiff is Prime Minister , also is the Finance minister, Plaintiff may come up with the audit, and consciously accept supervision. So that people feel at ease, that was common sense for accountability.

    Meanwhile, Plaintiff’s job may protest his national life safety .

    Unfortunately, over the past 10 years, Plaintiff did not produce any finance report of the State Treasurer, Singaporeans did not complaint the Plaintiff’s dereliction of duty, that is the most great tolerance citizens in the World.

    However Plaintiff did not appreciate.

    3)

    As a judge have to understand that Singaporeans make a lot of sacrifice for our Republic Singapore

    Eighth

    1)

    As a judge, you knew, the law is based on facts, rather than relying try to figure out, suggesting, hinting, conjecture and other psychology activities. Different values of those who have different psychological perspective.

    2)

    This is unwarranted, invisible, intangible things, how the laws of Singapore by using “imply” and other psychology activities do decide libel case ?

    let us borrow your logic and use the same way of thinking as what you said, that this conclusion ” implies ” — You do this libel judgment , it implies your psychology activities hidden behind the shadow that you have a motivation to murder !

    you angry ? not fair ?

    look, the same things, only based on ” suggesting “, or ” hinting “, or “conjecture ” and other psychology activities ? of course it is not law .

    3)

    Again, the law should be based on facts, rather than continue on the basis of ” implied ” for raping of public opinion and the common sense.

    In the face of the facts, the judge should magnanimous, especially toward an rival who had no power. the more importantly, be selflessness. Under no circumstances should adhere to the principle, do righteousness,be ethical , benevolent , big-hearted, unselfish, chivalrous, noble, forgiving, merciful.

    4)

    People believed judge entrusted the exercise judicial power of the Republic Singapore . the nature of Singapore law also determines the power in the hands of judges to discuss issues to speak of democracy.

    but very sorry, Singapore judge at this point shows not on behalf of justice and progress. lack of integrity,for those with ulterior motives conspiracy to succeed.

    Ninth

    starting from 250,000 SGD as libel compensation ?

    For those took monthly huge price salary from states finance account, it is a peanuts.
    But for those common people of Singapore,that is an vampire .

    Singapore court act the business, indirectly vampire, work with ruling party together from last 50 years, have already drained the last drop of common people’s blood. led to countless victims often commit suicide happened each month, life ruin and death, Singapore shall not become killing fields by such evil ” law “, your hands are stained with the blood of the murderous, in this sense, you use your hands are pushing innocent in their end of misery life .

    Tenth point

    1)
    This time, the Plaintiff firstly violating the principle of harmony Singapore , seriously abuse of power , the Plaintiff’s office deprived the defendant’s job, the next , the Plaintiff used his control of the all Singapore medias advertised a series humiliation the defendant’s character, they conducted several spiritual destruction punished on the defendant Roy Ngerng Yi Ling , it last long , more often, intimidating, insulting others supporter arbitrarily , they designed the HLP event conflicts . causing serious harm to the point of hopeless of Singaporeans

    implement serious political persecution against the defendant, caused mental torture, vile and serious consequences, with deep regret .

    2)

    Please go take a look at the defendant’s blog,

    If the judge and the Plaintiff work together concluded libel case , but you bring very strong disaster to many others of us , up to the rest of lifetime was forever label by the humiliation, that you are really considered a sin Court.

    We hope Singapore Justice, correct balance of law, stop persecuting action against nationals. We called on to rescue the victim Roy Ngerng Yi Ling.

    We understand the true nature of civilians from the defendant Roy’s bolg. Innocent soul, awe-inspiring righteousness, his spiritual is shining light of Singapore’s historical progress.

    Please unconditional verdict this innocent boy acquitted

  4. An open letter to Supreme Court of Singapore,

    Open letter to the High Court, Supreme Court of Singapore

    ( Revision )

    Re: Several questions to the Singapore judiciary

    Dear Sir

    The First

    1)

    what is the definition of libel? The legal description refers to the use of violence or other means, deliberately fabricated and spread fictitious facts.

    2)

    Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited ‘s initial set up capital was the major contribution from the fund of CPF, CPF is a pension of Singapore common people . that fact is fiction ? Or the defendant intentionally fabricated it ?

    3)

    If it is not fiction, nor fabricated, then libel not established;
    Find out the truth, the key to audit Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited .

    Once again for those so-called ” implied “, try to figure out other psychological activities, are not libel case basis.

    Is nonsense .

    The second

    1)

    As an independent judge, you witness the defendant and his family suffered by a series of “punishment”, and still show Indifferent , you are not only deviates significantly from the judicial basis of the track, that is the legal basis of the truth. And contrary to the axiom of human co-existence. with a legal hat, staged a brutally spirit rapes towards the common people of Singapore

    And thus come to an important legal aphorism: “No person shall benefit from its mistakes, or harm others.”

    2)

    Ladies and gentlemen, in the misappropriation of people’s pension CPF into set up capital fund in
    Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited, this is an indisputable fact .

    The judgment of libel was established , not only the loss of evidence-based principles of law, and black and white reversed, deprivation the purpose of public welfare, so that the current laws of Singapore and its public morality effect disappear .

    3)

    Tilted to the plaintiff to deal with cases, but it must be within the law permitted magnitude , but we please asking you, in the fact of Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited ‘s set up capital fund was come from people’s pension accout , how to cover up the magnitude of this , Mr.Judge ?

    and you and the plaintiff in private relations, such a problem is not illegal, but involved an unethical judges. apparently “invisible power ” who behind the door of Court hurt innocent people. Leads to social differentiation. And the judge your own mental defects are closely related.

    The third point

    In current extremely difficult moment , Singapore law should be the last bulwark for social justice. Now, we come together to do the following analysis:

    1)

    Singaporeans handed over their 36% of monthly salary to the pension ” money keeper “,

    the ” money keeper ” may keep updating with the owner. or the owner ask their ” money keeper ” for updating, both way are makes sense, nothing to do with sin or libel .

    2)

    For that rich people, the impact is less than what the pension. Down and out on the very poor people, the pension is their life.

    People suffering 36 percent of the monthly salary to pay out, years by years only left a few rags, a pair of shoes, live frugally, they living in hunger, no decent dress, but they were told the 55-year-old will not get back the pension, in desperation, people began to question the government, but no respond .

    3)

    Therefore, people wrote in his blog asked God, asked the Buddha, asked for Mercy, this it nothing to do with sin or libel .

    People are innocent. Roy Ngerng Yi Ling is innocent. the pension’s owner is innocent

    4)

    the guilty party is the one who try to frame Roy , because his wife is the boss of Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited. therefore he implemented a series of political persecution against the blog writer.

    The fourth point

    1)

    We ask the judge, your paper listed long than 39 pages of long judgment, all in nonsense. you wasted the national resources, the intention to rewrite the rule of Singapore law to become a family’s practice lynching.

    You even ordered a prohibition of the common people ask an help from Heaven for their pension ? prohibit people ask Gods ? You are not the human being, you want people to against Gods ?

    This is an violation of the laws of science.

    So that judges, Singapore law in front of the power was shows a completely impotence.

    You have not only lost the respect for the law, but also the loss of self-esteem. And if a judge without dignity, leading the public to lose confidence in the whole society, directly threating the integrity of the foundation of Singapore.

    2)

    We say the least that before audit Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited, libel is not established.

    As we all knew, Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited is an venture capital fund from the contribution of pension CPF, NOW who made it secretive ? why ban people to ask ? our own pension ,
    we are prohibited for ask ? It is completely extremely ridiculous.

    3)

    While the PM current declared delay to 10 years later return people’s pension, the postpone return is due to Temasek Holdings Pte Ltd in the United States lost $ 40 billion ‘s sequelae.

    Will Singapore law based on the fact ?
    based on the partially CPF transferred to Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited ?
    Or based on the Plaintiff’s psychological activity ?

    Please consider the following evidence

    once again, what is libel and what is the definition of libel? Legal description refers to the use of violence or other means, deliberately fabricated and spread fictitious facts.

    4)

    However Temasek Holdings Pte Ltd’s initial set up capital contribution from the fund of CPF, and that fact is not fiction . no one intentionally fabricated it , Include the defendant.

    So, libel simply not established .

    The Fifth

    1)

    The world’s farthest distance is not from the Earth to the Moon , but a judge from common people of Singapore. the Libel fines started from 250,000.00 SGD ? for the poorer class, it makes the suddenly law become a sounding Mafia judge.

    let us look at the status quo, according to the plaintiff if the wish fulfilled libel case, then may we ask that what is the injuries for the plaintiff’s there?

    from last a few months We have seen every day the plaintiff still happy, sightseeing tour every month, eating delicacies, drinking bird’s nest. Shows the plaintiff simply innocuous.

    2)

    Similarly, we have seen the defendant Roy’s family has been threatened every day, they fear, much suffering after jobless, did not sleep well for a single night, he even did not own a decent dress for himself. worried that 50 years ago our ancestors suffered the White Terror is back again, don’t know in the next day dead or alive omen enveloped the people atrium

    3)

    If you judge and Lee Kuan Yew family no superior-subordinate relationship, why persecuting the young guy the very same as persecuting Tang Liang Hong , exactly the same ton of bricks ?

    The sixth point

    1)

    Here it is necessary with everybody to share a folk tale:

    The owner has hundred ounce gold, he buried it under the ground, and put a note on the ground ” here no gold”

    his neighbor stole the gold, but also left a note wrote: “The next-door neighbor did not steal the gold.”

    This means that they are guilty, so they always make a statement. This the same example and someone put pressure on the judge , issued a statement the same meaning.

    2)

    ” where is your CPF going to ?”, for this question, innocent people do not need explain

    Plaintiff is Prime Minister , also is the Finance minister, Plaintiff may come up with the audit, and consciously accept supervision. So that people feel at ease, that was common sense for accountability.

    Meanwhile, Plaintiff’s job may protest his national life safety .

    Unfortunately, over the past 10 years, Plaintiff did not produce any finance report of the State Treasurer, Singaporeans did not complaint the Plaintiff’s dereliction of duty, that is the most great tolerance citizens in the World.

    However Plaintiff did not appreciate.

    3)

    As a judge have to understand that Singaporeans make a lot of sacrifice for our Republic Singapore

    The seventh point

    1)

    As a judge, you knew, the law is based on facts, rather than relying try to figure out, suggesting, hinting, conjecture and other psychology activities. Different values of those who have different psychological perspective.

    2)

    This is unwarranted, invisible, intangible things, how the laws of Singapore by using “imply” and other psychology activities do decide libel case ?

    let us borrow your logic and use the same way of thinking as what you said, that this conclusion ” implies ” — You do this libel judgment , it implies your psychology activities hidden behind the shadow that you have a motivation to murder !

    you angry ? not fair ?

    look, the same things, only based on ” suggesting “, or ” hinting “, or “conjecture ” and other psychology activities ? of course it is not law .

    3)

    Again, the law should be based on facts, rather than continue on the basis of ” implied ” for raping of public opinion and the common sense.

    In the face of the facts, the judge should magnanimous, especially toward an rival who had no power. the more importantly, be selflessness. Under no circumstances should adhere to the principle, do righteousness,be ethical , benevolent , big-hearted, unselfish, chivalrous, noble, forgiving, merciful.

    4)

    People believed judge entrusted the exercise judicial power of the Republic Singapore . the nature of Singapore law also determines the power in the hands of judges to discuss issues to speak of democracy.

    but very sorry, Singapore judge at this point shows not on behalf of justice and progress. lack of integrity,for those with ulterior motives conspiracy to succeed.

    Eighth

    Starting from 250,000 SGD as libel compensation ?

    For those took monthly huge price salary from states finance account, it is a peanuts.
    But for those common people of Singapore,that is an vampire .

    Singapore court act the business, indirectly vampire, work with ruling party together from last 50 years, have already drained the last drop of common people’s blood. led to countless victims often commit suicide happened each month, life ruin and death, Singapore shall not become killing fields by such evil ” law “, your hands are stained with the blood of the murderous, in this sense, you use your hands are pushing innocent in their end of misery life .

    Ninth

    1)

    Through observation over the past six months, we would see the Plaintiff firstly violating the principle of harmony Singapore , seriously abuse of power , the Plaintiff’s office deprived the defendant’s job, the next , the Plaintiff used his control of the all Singapore medias advertised a series humiliation the defendant’s character, they conducted several spiritual destruction punished on the defendant Roy Ngerng Yi Ling , it last long , more often, intimidating, insulting others supporter arbitrarily , they designed the HLP event conflicts . causing serious harm to the point of hopeless of Singaporeans

    implement serious political persecution against the defendant, caused mental torture, vile and serious consequences, with deep regret .

    Tenth point

    1)

    Let’s go take a look at the defendant’s blog,

    If the judge and the Plaintiff work together concluded libel case , but you bring very deep disaster to many others of Singaporeans, up to the rest of lifetime was forever label by the humiliation, that you are really considered a sin Court.

    We loudly called Singapore Justice, correct balance of law, stop persecuting continue to against nationals. We called on to rescue the victim Roy Ngerng Yi Ling.

    We understand the true nature of civilians from the defendant Roy’s bolg. Innocent soul, awe-inspiring righteousness, his spiritual is shining light of Singapore’s historical progress.

    Please unconditional verdict this innocent boy acquitted

  5. ????

    May I what is going to happen after we vote out the PAP? Will the new government have the solution for us to live the wonderful life that we all want and that is being denied to us by the selfish PAP or will the new government continue what PAP has been doing?

    • Xmen

      Take a look at Japan, Taiwan and South Korea. Their voters finally kicked out the long serving incumbent political parties because they were no longer serving the interests of the people. So ask yourself these questions – Are you better off now than 5 years ago? Will your children be better off than you?

    • Nothing To Lose

      What do we have to lose by voting out PAP?
      After 60 years of sucking my blood, there is nothing else left to lose.

      • Ravi

        If they have been sucking your blood, will they have been in power for 60 years ? No wonder people here are losers, they can’t even think.

    • ????

      I am asking because the way people have been behaving is that the moment PAP get voted out, we will have the wonderful life, but which party have that solution?

      By the way I don’t think the people are happy with the new government in Japan, Korea and Taiwan either and the situation has not improve with the new government at all especially in Japan and Taiwan.

      • Xmen

        You don’t understand the principles of democracy and competition of ideas. If PAP is voted out, you can be certain that some areas will improve (e.g. Immigration, Job Security, Affordability, Retirement, National Service) and some areas will be hit (e.g. Monopolies, Defense.)

        People in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan have a choice. They are free to bring back the old regimes if they believe it serves their interests. Who are you to judge that they are unhappy with their elected government? There is a saying that “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” The Singapore people are free to bring back PAP if the opposition does not improve their lives. But they need to take the first steps…

      • JayF

        Dear X-Men

        But Japan did indeed return their former govts they voted out to power. With an overwhelming majority at that. So did S.Korea and Taiwan.

      • ????

        @Xmen

        What make you so certain that certain areas will definitely be improve? I am just merely stating that there is an equal possibility that the new government may not change anything and nothing will be improved. There is no need to get all worked up and say that I don’t understand the principles of democracy and competition of ideas.

        By the way, I have friends who come from those countries, I have lived in Taiwan and Japan for a period of time, and I do read news articles about their political situation, so I think I can say that they are not happy with the elected government.

      • Xmen

        @JayF,

        The current regimes in Japan, Taiwan and South Korea are very different from their former regimes, even if they are from the same parties. If PAP loses the next election, when they return to power in future, you will see a very DIFFERENT party with changed priorities. Political renewal is key to the progress of any political party/country.

        @????,

        Here are three areas that will definitely get better – GINI index will narrow, press freedom will improve, immigration will be significantly cut back. In most democracies, only about half the people are happy with their government. Even in this one-party state, over 4 in 10 is unhappy with the PAP (especially if you take into account the last 2 BEs and the PE.) So it is normal that some people in Taiwan and Japan are unhappy with their current governments.

      • ????

        Sorry but there aren’t any absolutes. The three areas that you mention are all dependent on the actions the new government will take and will not change automatically just because there is a new political party in power.

        There is nothing normal about the unhappiness of the people in Taiwan and Japan with their current government, it reflects the disappointment of the majority against the government who have done nothing much to improve the situation. So these counties are not accurate examples of countries that improved once the long serving incumbent political parties get voted out.

  6. Ravi

    Look at the losers here, they think that but changing the government and the system, their lives will just become better. Lol. These people will continue to suffer in their own pathetic attitude forever.

    • happy ravi

      Ravi bro, Well, I think a positive thing is that u know that u ain’t no loser, and that’s good enough oredi right?

      U happy can liao lor….lols

  7. Ravi

    What’s the point of the poll here ? The past election results are already caste in stone. Roy knows he is fighting a losing cause and he is struggling to come to term with that. In the internet the majority votes are against the government, but the actual results are opposite. Tis is because people who are disgruntled with their lives will keep complaining in the open, while those who are contented and practical are taking their lives in their own hands. That is the difference between winners and losers.

    • happy ravi

      it’s ok Ravi, cos u have never led a life of dignity. u just think of your comfortable life where ur enjoying this current reality with your 5 senses, n when things r going well in your life, Your empathy simply is uncultivated. Thus u c them as losers, it’s fine bro, as ur entitled to your own viewpoints. But trust me, u will be happier and not so vindictive towards others once u see them as fellow human beings also have the right of expression.

      At the end of the day, we all have families, wives, husbands and loving old-aged parents. Even the Prime Minister and president have as well.

      But we are in this world for 60 years or so ( First 20 years are wasted on studying and finding a spouse or working hard in life ).
      So tomorrow if the Head Of State dies, life still goes on.

      Thus, there’s absolutely no need to be so anal. Take things easy, chillax, smell the roses and just give these people a chance shall we?

      I know u r happy and u think that the majority of the ‘losers’ ( As how u depicted ) are disgruntled. Have u tried to empathize with them? Think about it bro, if the govt is fantastic, will anyone want to vote for opposition or be a left-wingist? Will anyone wear red and shout in the wet market about corruption?

      These people are not disgruntled bro. In fact, they are living in a life of a higher level of vibrations. That’s empathy. But negativity is constantly being created to cramp their style. N that includes u bro.

      Stay frosty mate.

  8. SIMPLE

    In a crisis, Singaporean turn to PAP. You think that they will put themselves in a crisis by voting PAP out. Look at Singapore Election result 2001.

  9. Ravi

    Many of you say the government is so bad, but the fact that they have won every election for the past 60 years, is proof that they are the best choice. The reason why countries choose the democracy system of one man one vote, is because it guarantees the best choice of government is selected. But there will always be people who blames their demise on the system .

    • happy ravi

      So bro, are u blaming the people cos they blame their demise on the system? make up your mind bro. Chill n relax, no need to be so aggressive in our bro Roy’s blog.

      If everyone can be chillax and treat everyone like our bros, then our former male nurse might not be sued till his pants drop liao.

      It’s all about caring. Remember in army how we bros used to cover for each other? Sadly this trait have been gone ever since we stepped into this society. What do u think Ravi?

  10. Meiling

    I don’t know what the PAP is doing with our money at Suzhou and Tianjin. Did it benefit me or any Singaporean on the street? Nope. I also don’t know why the PAP is paying $30,000 for a PRC officer to take an English course? Neither do I understand why the PAP is sponsoring tonners of foreigners to come here study with scholarships and grants. And even how much is left in our reserves is not made known. Or why the RC nowadays have so many foreigners. I think Roy should write more instead of stopping here. We need to know what happen to our money.

    • happy ravi

      Meiling, please deal with it.

      Cos:
      1) They got the money
      2) They can

      Without Foreigners coming in the country> Jobs won’t be filled up *(This is what minister usually tells us)>Economic engine cannot move>Recession

      That’s why if costs are being kept low, the economic engine of a model can work smoothly because the top rule in business is:
      Keep cost low and profit margin high.

      I know ur feeling curious and upset even. But u gotta grit your teeth and bear with all these shit that’s going on. Never underestimate the power of your thoughts as well as the determination to want and succeed. Look at Mark Zuckerberg.

      He kena scolded and ostracized by Harvard’s school management for his stupid FaceMash program where girls photos are being put and students were told o vote between the two. Instead of being encouraged by his school authourities to use this program for useful purpose and recognizing his talents, he was being told off and condemned.

      He quitted and set up Facebook. Today he is the youngest billionaire in this world.

      What I’m trying to say is: Ur living in a society where everyone is like robots and do not have the old ‘Kampung Spirit’. In 2014 our country, everybody simply cares about themselves. You on your TV, negative programs are being broadcast to brainwash u into not fulfilling your potential. There is no one to encourage us.

      Mark Zuckerberg had the conviction and if enough people have the conviction for a change, things will be toppled and a new world order in our reality will be created.

      Our first step: Is to find the self-confidence within yourself first, be positive and have the conviction to succeed and change the status-quo cos if we want something enough, we will it to happen and we get it.

      That’s how ‘Founding Father’ ( According to 154th ) got his personal country. His level of conviction is so high that he managed to get it. But at what costs? Still, it’s been proven that conviction can move mountains and inspire. Just don’t de-inspire people like the shit we see and read on a daily basis lor.

  11. 对PAP的看法

    有几个原因PAP赢得过去60年的大选:

    1,当时的新加坡是马来西亚的领土之一, 以马来人为主的马来西亚依靠宗教信仰,学习可兰经的重视度远远超过学习数学,科学,地理, 政治等, 当时的马来人对领土割让还不太当一回事。 新加坡华人占很大比例, 马来人因此对新加坡的放弃, 是至今为止新加坡人饮水思源的一个神话。

    国外留学经验, 使得李光耀先生从英国人那里学到了竞选必须首先组织一个党派 , 才能要主宰自己的命运。 老李先生是一个有使命, 有抱负,有远见,有聪明才智的年轻华人代表,当时的新加坡, 很多人对政治毫无兴趣, 少数有兴趣的人和老李先生并肩作战,一同前往英国争取新加坡独立, 他们一同开大会 ,一同发誓当英国殖民地撤离后,要建立一个对国人未来有福利保障的新加坡。

    后来不知怎么了, 老李先生的伙伴们都一一地莫名其妙地被抓了起来,有的失踪了, 有的死去了, 有的逃离了。
    只剩下李光耀自己,于是在一共没有几个人当中, 赢得了第一届大选。

    2. 首先,李光耀的治国理念帮助了PAP站领了市场, 他通过国外媒体的采访表示,他的理念是: 消除贪污腐败, 廉政治国,政府的第一优先考虑的是, 争取实现国民的福利为第一优先治国目标。这一下子, 感动了上上下下男女老少, 赢得了第二届大选。 这个证据可以通过youtube找到老李先生当年发誓并作承若的电视讲话

    3. 后来,老李先生果然做的很有成效, 免费出租港口向外吸引生意等等,还有基本免税出租土地的招商政策, 使得集合全民的公积金得到了最大效益的发挥, 比如建房子, 公积金政策, 造机场, 买飞机, 到处投资, 回报的利润让昔日的小渔村顿时旧貌换新颜起来。

    当时, 老李先生他们一家和人民几乎没有什么大距离, 人民对他们家只有一辆车和一个有院子的房子, 还有三个未成年的孩子,人民对PAP满意。

    尤其是有一件事, 一位负责国家土地规划的部长,在收取了发展商好处费后,被李光耀老先生下命令, 由贪污调查局展开调查后, 这位部长请求见老李先生, 被老李先生拒绝地说 :” 如果我会见了你, 我就涉嫌知情, so No, I can only see you after the investigation .”

    第二天,部长自杀后并留下一张字条给老李先生 :” 你是一个圣人。 “

    这个事情被公布后,于是再次赢得大选。 全球最廉政的国家。
    ( 这个也可以从YouTube上阅读李光耀先生的这番讲话内容 )

    4. 人是会变得。 从早期的30万,扩大到现在的500万, 除了房地产多了,人口也拥挤了起来, 这不但帮助公积金的总数增多了,而且新加坡政府开始通过EDB向国外人收钱卖护照, 这是全球仅有的一个国家向有钱的人出售新加坡护照, 从100万到500万不等, 新加坡越来越像香港靠经。 但这不影响新加坡的PAP领袖。

    PAP尝到了掌权的好处,他们不打算放弃这个又有权,又有钱的好处, 但是他们也担心会输掉正真意义上的大选,
    于是,开始玩臭。 一方面国家的财富在他们的掌控中, 他们不是把反对党告倒破产, 就是把反对党的人以种种莫须有的罪名抓起来,搞到人家家破人亡, 这样没有竞争了,他们又赢得啦大选。

    5. 老李先生90多岁老去了,他的儿子接过PAP的权利,开始的时候,每个人都抬头向李显龙先生仰望致敬, 尤其对他的英俊形象, 赢得了广大女性选票的支持。 最要命的是他的发言或演讲,比她的父亲更具贴诱惑力地近老百姓, 很有人情味,选民无法抗拒他的语言震撼, 不可否认, 这一点他获得满分。

    即使他一年都不露面, 仅靠一次“ 甜言蜜语”的发言,或唱一支“ 明天你还会等我吗 ? ”, 人民就心满意足了。

    这样,李显龙的PAP赢得了大选。

    6. 国家有事情发生,比如人民频繁地逃漏自杀,接不起婚, 生不起孩子,老人没饭吃,年轻人没工作, 女人没丈夫,孩子没出世就患上 “ special needs kids ”疾病, 新加坡被BBC评为和非洲最穷的国家一样, 排名世界上最不快乐的国家第一名。

    新加坡怎么了 ? 这么多GDP, 不应该自杀啊,这么多高楼大厦,美丽花园,为什么快乐指数倒数第一呢 ?走进近距离观察, 从他对待Roy等国人目前的报复性动作来看,原来, 李总理的美丽演讲,是由别人为他写的, 不然他的言行如此地不一致,演讲稿并不是他自己的心里话,他对国情很不了解 。再这样的局面下,大选如果是在一个法律严格保护下, 警方以中立的立场不随便捉人的话,在PAP不许作弊的前提下, PAP不会赢。

    因为,换一个新领袖, 天不会塌下来。 不过,霸占权利这么久的人那里甘愿下台呢,那么多财富怎么啊…..
    折中的办法是 : 要拿出大度量对待人民。 你给人们一杯水, 人们给你一个天。 PAP要改 !要对人民好 !

  12. 对PAP的看法

    第一次从电视上听到李显龙总理的国庆演讲, 和家人一起感动的留下了眼泪。
    第二次听到他的演讲,停下手中的工作,坐下来,喝一杯, 提前庆祝。
    第三次听, 正好有来自澳洲的朋友, 于是他们埋怨他们国家的总理演讲是多么的乏味难听, 而新加坡总理的演讲比唱的还好听, 总之大家被演讲搞的心怀澎湃,激动不已。 记得当时yahoo Singapore 网上进行对总理演讲收集赞美之次的反馈, 我也在网上发表了高度评价李总理的留言, 当时我是100%的, 发至内心的崇拜李总理

    第四次…很忙, 365天,天天工作, 呼吸困难,错过听演讲
    第五次….每天都收到传票, 天天上法庭,总理演讲那天, 我的车在高速公路上飞奔,停不下来听演讲。
    第六次… 我每天工作超过14个小时,拼命挣扎,高血压180度, 快要死了, 顾不上听演讲。

    第N次, 是在离开新加坡以后在YouTube看到李总理的演讲, 还有用华文演讲的人是一位林先生。我们不再激动……,一直到李总理告Roy的诽谤案之前,至少没有证据证明什么 。

    如果在演讲中描述的实惠在接下来无数个的365天看不到,
    如果演讲里面的人情味在现实中变成翻脸不认人的控告案,

    说严重一点,这个演讲带有欺骗性。它骗走了我们的青春, 时间, 健康和对家园建设的代价。
    说轻微一点,李总理还没有治国的本事, 一切靠他人扶持, 包括对Roy的迫害。

  13. 对PAP的看法

    我曾经在最潦倒的时候,多次把自己的不幸遭遇通过发电邮向李总理求助或投诉,但从来没有接收到他们的回复与人道支援。我离开新加坡以后,有一段时间我每天写日记并通过发电子邮件,把我对新生活的感动与民主国家的好处与总理分享。

    李总理有一次讲话说,现在新加坡与挪威等国一样的水准, 我才恍然大悟, 原来总理根本不看他的电子邮箱,因为在这个邮箱里,我曾向他分享过一些我的日记,在我的日记里描写了我现在住的国家发给我的福利涵盖, 说明新加坡在对待国民的福利方面落后于与西方文明国家至少100年 。 如果总理看到我的日记, 就不会讲什么新加坡和挪威的生活是一样水准这种错话了。

    我对总理的惊讶不只如此,并接二连三:

    2个月前当我在支持Roy的言论发表后,口气很总理办公室的人一直跟我的帖 ,她说她知道我, 她要我闭嘴, 否则… 滚出去。 (因为我在这里所写的内容和我在寄给总理的日记中写的是一模一样的 )…

    我们不但长期在新加坡投诉无门,总理办公室还会把人们写给总理的人生曾经不幸遭遇拿出来威胁将爆料给八卦, 这是非常可耻的总理办公室行为。如果李总理根本不看他的邮件,不过问, 也不使用这个电子邮箱, 你们当局不要在网上公布这个邮箱地址嘛 。 这对民众带有欺骗性, 导致我对李总理非常地不满 。

    如果有另一只手, 那么纪律呢 ?你们内部没有纪律吗 ?

    造成总理的职业道德受到疑问。恐吓传播公民隐私部分也是犯罪行为。 总理邮箱本来 是政府为了廉洁执政与民众沟通的一个管道。 现在搞到邮箱挂总理的名字, 在收集公民隐私, 出卖国民的辛酸历程为满足小市民私欲的下流行为。

    为什么人民一定要帮Roy与韩慧慧, 答案就在一系列小事上, 极其不可思议,这是政府还是一个人家 ?

  14. 对PAP的看法

    再来聊一聊大家经常听到的一句话, 每当国人被挫败, 发泄不满的时候。 当局办公室的人站在制高点上, 出言不逊说:“ 你不满意 ? 滚出去, 放弃公民权啦 。”

    今天暂且不对当局办公室人的政治、道德、自警、自律、勤政廉政等素质剖析,

    问题来了。 新加坡的领土本来是谁的 ? 到底谁才有资格提出 “ 请你滚出去 ” ?
    是当局办公室的人吗 ? 不一定 。 你今天在那里养尊处优, 明天选民不选你, 你一样要“ 滚出去”。

    那么你滚到那里去呢 ?上天知道, 新加坡本来就不是谁的谁的。 即使已经变成了谁的谁的, 也应该记住这个马来西亚领土的割让,本来不属于自己的东西拿到手了, 虽说不是抢来的, 也是侥幸与当时马来人没有国家领土意识的常识。

    “ 你不满意 ? 滚出去, 放弃公民啦 。” – – 最有资格说这句话的人, 是马来西亚当局。

    拿到了人家马来西亚领土,不知怎么的, 又不感激上帝, 马来人是新加坡3大种族里面最穷的人, 几乎很少有马来人是住在公寓里面的, 他们的个性很简单, 最快乐的是全家一起到东海岸搭个帐篷, 吃烧烤。

    如果PAP对人民好, 这些问题都被忘记, 淡马锡,公积金, GIC , 天价薪水, 部长变成暴发户, 继续执政,等等,都不是问题。反之, 这些就是问题。

  15. averageguysg

    @Xmen. I disagree with you vehemently on a lot of things but you are right on the democracy. There has to be the freedom to vote the incumbent out, the alternative in, and the incumbent back in if things do not go right. In the early years of our independence this would have been disruptive, a long uninterrupted reign for the PAP was the main reason whereby long term policies can be implemented. But we have reached a certain saturation point that fresh ideas, policies, and interventions are needed from time to time.

    @Ravi. You’re right. I think in any society there are people who are at the bottom of the heap because of their laziness and incompetence. This is inevitable. To expect 180 degrees change in a short few years just be voting in a new government is definitely naive. But there are people who think it. Let them. They will continue thinking the same even after the government has been changed.

    @Recruit Ong. Yeah, most of Roy Ngerng’s supporters are from the core anti-PAP group anyway. This is something that I have always pointed out, and have always been rebuffed by the same few statements that Roy Ngerng has influenced so many Singaporeans its just that they have not shown it, but the results will come shown at the coming GE.

    And my question is always how much has he really influenced, with his brand of antics, that would not already have been present?

    Take this survey for instance. He shows the 2006 and 2011 results. We all know the PAP was returned to power with 66% and 60% those times. His survey shows 75% each time saying that they did not vote for PAP. And this 75% carries over to the question of who will you vote for in 2016. It really just shows again, that it is the core anti-PAP group who is coming to this blog and partaking in his survey. This group has never considered voting PAP even when Roy Ngerng was not on the scene, and probably never will. It would be different, if he listed a statistic that says X% voted for PAP before, but will not do so now.

    2 questions. One, why organize polls and rallies? So that people will participate. And as we now know the people have not participated in great numbers. So the first question is, have such tactics failed?

    No, Roy’s supporters will say. Singaporeans are apathetic in nature and while they do not show up or donate any money, they know how to vote when the time comes. If that is the answer, then why continue is the second question? You are confident that your job is done, so why is there a need for more of these things, which garner poor participation, and then try to make justifications for your poor participation. The pool size of the survey in the first place is small anyway.

    40% voted against the PAP and its policies in 2011. Roy Ngerng wasn’t on the scene then. Since he came into the spotlight, how many votes did he manage to swing vs how many he manage to alienate? If 40% could judge back then, could it be that Singaporeans know how to judge on their own? Could this number increase on its own by people’s own judgement of the PAP? Are the opposition parties not convincing enough? Or do we really need Roy Ngerng and his brand of drama in this?

    • averageguysg

      Let me apologize and correct myself. His survey shows that (328/601)55% said no to the PAP in 2006, and about (348/538) 64% in 2011.

      • happy ravi

        Chill guys, we are all bros, there is no need to be vehemently disagreeing about. It’s a Sunday, so just chillax man.

        It’s good u guys have a patriotic sense of justice and all come into this Blog to discuss in the betterment of the society, to that I respect u guys for the love of your nation. So at the end of the day, there are no hardcore supporters or anti-group.

        We all die in a couple of years anyway, when we die, this system still goes on with or without us. The sun still rises up from east and goes down from the west.

        It all doesn’t matters. What matters is whether policies are executed correctly or wrongly? The right policies will help and benefit alot of people. The wrong ones like ‘Stop at One’ birth ruling in certain countries in which will cause alot of dead babies.

        Parents have to murder their children by means of abortion cos of policies that discourage them from having additional babies. But as citizens, one cannot do anything. Cos it’s heaven’s mandate where they are in power and that citizens are born into this country to suffer.

        I mean, if more and more people wake up to the fact that what they are doing will not serve the interests of the people and stop being muddle-headed, not be distracted by TV or things that allow us to enjoy in 5 sense reality, not being misdirected by trolls sent to distorted the actual truth, not lose hope oneself that the individual are helpless, then this collective positive will bring changes to this entire society.

        Roy have a good heart. But he approached the problems in a negative approach, thus knocking over a hornet’s nest. Now Roy’s life is spiraling out of control. Why? cos he spread negativity and fear in the first place.

        Think of Roy as a weapon. U weaponize it with negative nuclear stuff, Hiroshima comes, but if Roy is upbeat and positive about change, he will influence others into being positive individuals with a willpower to change. With this collective willpower, realities can change and in this miserly short existence of one’s lives, change could be enacted in such a simple flick of a switch. From negative crap to positive.

        They are most afraid of positive people cos positive people like us are operating on a higher level of vibration frequencies compared to the low level vibration energies where they have millions in pay cheques every month.

  16. 对PAP的看法

    巴以(巴勒斯坦和以色列)冲突也是缘由领土之争,世界上没有一个国家愿意割自己的土地, 都在为保护领土而战 。 要么出租100年后收回主权, 要么向自治区象征性收费。 本来是马来人的领土, 就好像某个老人在痴呆的状态下,做了一个痴呆的决定,把遗产转让给外人一样, 本来的穷光蛋, 转眼间变成了主人。

    既然领土原本的主人不是现有的谁谁谁, 那么, 居住在这里的人群对土地的眷恋程度远远低于当地的土著马来人 。换句话说, 新加坡打官司人数比例排名世界第一, 执政与国人黑脸相待, 原来不是同根生,相煎就太急 。这是到目前为止, 为 “ 迫害基因” 找到的一个原始理由。

    也就是说,如果领土本来就是新加坡人的, 这些迫害就没有了。取而代之的是爱。

    EDB向有钱的外国人贩卖护照,政府扩建赌场, 为国人成立破产局, 在一片废墟上建立收费最昂贵的法院大厦等动作, 这些都是对新加坡极其不负责任的规划, 把新加坡打造成一个 “ 看不见的战场 ”, 将原汁原味的 “ 新加坡 ” 灭亡 。

    到目前为止,在任的几位政治领袖都只顾自己金库满满, 做马屁精, 成不了栋梁之才, 他们没有独立的思想, 比起Roy的分析头脑差远了, 他们没有一个将名垂史册。可以预见50年后,新加坡将被外国有钱人占领,新加坡将沦陷再次变为殖民地。

  17. 对PAP的看法

    据说,不久前李总理建议国人不要读大学了, 没有文凭也一样有机会升职…
    我们对这一位从前的精英, 当代新加坡的“末代皇帝”, 其思维演变过程心痛不已。 怎么能教导孩子们不多读书呢 ?意味着什么呢 , 如同淡马锡控股损失40亿美元交易的人不会算经济账, 好比马来西亚东菇在割让国家领土时还不懂代价是多大的天文数字数, 太可怕了。 有一天新加坡被外国人买下来, 会算账的人还没有培养出来。

    凡是做长辈的,都鼓励孩子们多读书, 书有多高, 就读多高。
    除非家境十分困难,比如父母双亡, 需要过早地挑起养家的担子, 不得不缀学除外。

    依照第一世界国家的做法,新加坡政府必须给只要考入大学的本地人孩子,完全学费免费, 并提供他们在读书时期间基本的生活费, 以鼓励新加坡人的孩子受高等教育, 为新加坡未来投资教育,即实惠, 又比淡马锡拿钱去买房地产投资更划算。

    因为, 大多数第一世界国家的房地产不是增值的。 比如, 德国, 英国,日本, 美国等。

    新加坡当局不理解一个真相, 即第一世界国家的房地产, 是用来照顾他们本国人民, 不是用来给投机分子搞“ 竞争” 用途。 他们的政策限制基本价格在30年期间不许变。

    你淡马锡或GIC投多少,就等于亏多少 。再把他们房地产的暖气供应费加进去, 以后根本卖不出去。 除非卖给新加坡人自己人。 人家第一世界国家不是傻瓜,他们政策上早就为左手买进, 右手卖出的投机商关大门啦。

  18. Si Yuan

    Missing question – “If you think the PAP is doing a bad job, do you think that Roy Ngerng is sufficiently qualified to do anything about it?”

  19. 对PAP的看法

    1. PAP如果倒台, 相信很多人会哭泣, 不舍得。建国之父如一家之长, 打骂体罚孩子, 都是为了孩子好。但终究是人民内部矛盾, 要有尺度, 给犯错一方机会。孩子们自然会回到父爱的怀抱。

    2. PAP在硬件 ( 机场, 电讯, 设备 )建设方面, 堪称世界一流。如果把软件部分 ( 精神层面上的沟通, 所需要保障的功能;所承诺的可用性 ) 重新建立起来, PAP还是具备优势的。里面有很多功课就要看PAP愿不愿意做 , 比如:

    – – 总理, 总统等国家最高领袖的薪水是没有问题的。 问题出在部长的薪水, 他们还没有为国做出贡献,不应该把他们抬上了天, 他们的薪水应参照高级工程师待遇。

    人为财死鸟为食亡, 当不费力气地获得了巨款薪水以后,便失去了努力奋斗的推动力。 钱都到手了,还努力什么 ? 在这几个月来总理与民众的纠纷中, 部长失职并获利。

    — 政府需要引进不同意见的人, 给他们试试看, 比如 Xmen 和Roy, 给他们时间, 看他们能不能把民心拉回来, 凝聚在总理建国方针大策的周围, 为和谐的新加坡有力出力,有才干得出才干, 他们都不是威胁新加坡的人, 他们是自己人 ,他们也是总理的人, 他们对民间了如指掌, 他们是被总理过去丢弃的人, 总理现在把他们捡起来, 还来得及救国就党。 有些人妒忌他们,怕抢了他们的饭碗。 这并无伤大雅, 做一做低成本高回报的算术题, 他们每年将为国家节省大量的钱。

    3. PAP 并不是一个完全不好的执政党, 有一些懒惰鬼在里面, 没有发挥作用

    4. Roy 的家境与出生, 来自老老实实的纯朴人家,如果不要把他们逼急了, 他们顺从大局, 没有问题。最关键之处,不要再把他们拎到法院去了, 这种惊吓将带给他们吃不好,睡不好。

    如果新加坡当局愿意主动赦怀, 送Roy出过深造, 将最功德无量。
    他仍然需要学习

  20. 对PAP的看法

    说一句心里话, 如果李总理做一些改变, 我们没有理由不支持总理保住江山。 也不极愿意让世界有一天大跌眼镜,惊讶地看到李光耀先生创下的神话传奇新加坡变天。

    在哪些方面改变呢 ?

    1. 要区别对待国家公务员与老百姓的关系。
    对公务员要严,对老百姓要宽。宽容对待不拿国家一份钱的老百姓。 一般上国家首长不适宜起诉老百姓。 那一位建议总理起诉的人要反省。

    2. 公务员与社会阶层的薪水标准要接近 ( 总理,总统除外 ), 这对减少两极分化,创造和谐社会,同甘共苦,与情理之中。

    3. 由于国家人才济济,工作难寻, 公务员要打破终生制,实行聘用制, 招聘制。 做好了,续约, 否则让位给下一位。保持队伍新陈代谢的竞争力。

    4. 设立有效的调解委员会, 代替法庭纠纷。 减低彼此的伤害度。如果当前工作表现不得力的队伍,要及时换人。

    5. 对老一代的投诉, 要优先第一考虑并解决满足他们。 对历史遗留问题, 尽一切可能安慰他们, 并友善地安排他们返回新加坡走走看看。 这没什么大不了的.

    6, 了解做领袖与做普通人不同之处, 即领袖必须要有大度量, 宰相肚里能乘船。这是坐稳江山的必要一步。

  21. 对PAP的看法

    我们为什么在招聘员工的时候注重看他们的星座与血型,个别脾气古怪,不易接近,短期内不会立刻受到喜欢。但是实践证明,血型不同的人集合在一起将产生巨无霸的创造力。新加坡政府要管理500万人口的国家,有很多工作要做, 队伍里面需要这样的互补性 。

  22. 对PAP的看法

    随便聊聊:

    1. 经常连续在空中飞行,对身体是有危害。 我们通常所指的宇宙辐射是来自太阳以及其他星系的低能光子辐射,它会导致人体分子、细胞、组织结构受到损害。在高空因为大气层较稀薄,阻挡辐射的能力较低,乘客因此更易受到太阳辐射。

    联邦航空局的专家表示,一般乘客并不用惊慌,以他们的飞行次数和高度,还不至于增加患癌机会,但经常要作越洋飞行,在4万米高空飞行的人则应关注这个问题。 也希望李总理夫妇注意健康常识, 照顾好自己, 毕竟国家很多部门处于半瘫痪的睡觉状态, 很多事情还没有建立起来, 比如:

    2. 如果按照第一世界国家的做法, 通常每年的第三季度, 国家财政部长要在国会做财政报告, 并征求意见,于各党派达成一致。 比如今年的盈利是多少,花费了多少 ? 亏本了多少 ?明年的预算需要如何分配 ? 分配比例 ?给基础建设, 给儿童, 给老人, 给学校,给教育, 给外援, 给医院, 给花园,给机场, 给失业者等等等等。 无路将来谁做总理, 无论谁做财政部长,这个财务政策不会随着人的离去儿改变。 都要一份财政预算, 这才像一个国家。 而不是突然想到什么, 就突然宣布 “ 政府决定给 ….. ”

    想一想, 如果50年后的执政者也这么不按牌理出牌,随心所欲。 将使得国家财务分配不均, 一片混乱。 新加坡人的后代, 要怪前辈什么都没有建立起来 。

    3. 今天联合早报一边报道 “ 李总理与安倍首相举行早餐会谈 ”, 一边刊登 “ 日本实际GDP年率缩1.6% 经济陷入衰退 ”的新闻。 看了觉得太可笑了吧,新加坡真的像一个小孩子 ! 一便要和人家拉关系, 一边以为自己是一朵花,在意图贬低人家时, 不要忘记了一个真相, 即日本每年的對外援助在數額达到113億美元,他们对他们自己的国人福利待遇是亚洲最好的国家。 好吧, 下面聊一聊外援:

    4. 新加坡领袖积极参与什么G20啦, 首脑峰会啦等等, 不知道李总理是否真正明白其意义 ?

    第一, 发达国家在自己发达以后,以經濟援助來促進不发达國家的經濟發展。比如財政援助、技術援助、糧食援助等。 財政援助是為了幫助受援國發展經濟或緩解政府財政困難; 技術援助主要是轉讓技術專利、培養技術人才、傳授管理知識、提供咨詢服務等。请问李总理,你准本好了没有, 当美國捐款117億美元,德國對外援助額為70億美元,法國的援助額為79億美元,你新加坡早已宣称GNP的比重一直居於較高指數。你要拿多少亿出来呢 ? 你都宣称新加坡的国民是最有钱的国民了,参加了完了会议,不拿钱出来,人家 20G 谴责你啊。

    第二, 这不是只拿出来一次而已, 而是根据即以全球化為其主題。發達國家在進行發展援助的同時,缩小国家之间的贫富差距。 援助國際援助既包括物質形式的資金、技術、物品、人力, 要求建立更公正、合理的國際經濟貿易新秩序的強烈願望,同時提出了一系列有利於國際經濟平衡、健康、可持續發展的具體建議。根据这个精神。排名世界第一的新加坡要每一年都拿出至少20亿美元无偿捐助给穷困的国家。 这个非常尴尬。 因为:

    第三, 新加坡本国的国民50年来苦不堪言,当局在对本国内的 ” 經濟平衡、健康、可持續發展 “ 都做不到, 都无发满足对本国国民的 ” 援助既包括物質形式的資金、技術、物品、人力 “ 等, 哪里有这么”慷慨“的20亿拿出去白白送给人家 ?

    这就非常不好意思了。

    李总理需要学习的地方还很多
     

  23. 对PAP的看法

    在10月24日的欧盟秋季峰会上,欧盟委员会要求英国于12月1日为今年的欧盟预算增付21亿欧元,大约合17亿英镑,英国首相卡梅伦在24号举行的记者会上公开表示,他没有办法接受这一要求,并宣称不会支付。

    卡梅伦说:一个国家经济的增长,快一点或者慢一点,就需要对预算进行适当调整,我每年都这么做。有时候需要增加一点,有时候需要减少一点。但是从来没有一次要求增付21亿欧元的做法,这是不可接受的。这令人震惊。我们不会在12月1日支付这笔经费,这是不可能的。

    对于卡梅伦的不满,欧盟委员会主席巴罗佐24号表示,英国及其他增幅国家不应该对增幅要求感到惊讶,巴罗佐说欧盟委员会给出的数字是根据各成员国提供的数据计算得来的,他也表示,这个数字可在随后的欧盟财长会上进行讨论。而和法国一起获得一定程度预算减免,德国总理默克尔却表现的非常乐观,他认为英国会支付这笔经费,但是欧盟需要给英国一点时间。

    据了解,英国对欧盟预算的贡献一向名列前茅,但为何这次又要让英国“多付钱”呢。

    据报道,从1995年以来,欧洲预算是根据各国经济状况而决定各国出资比例的,最新提出的增幅要求源自不久前调整后的经济数据,在这份数据中,英国自爆目前的经济情况良好,获得了3%的经济增长。一份泄密的欧盟委员会的文件中显示,除了英国需要多付17亿英镑之外,荷兰需要多支付约5亿英镑,意大利是2.68亿英镑,希腊是7000万英镑,塞浦路斯3300万英镑。

    开国际峰会, 说到底就是把钱捐出来 。缩小贫富国家之间的距离。

    当新加坡人分享不到国有资源的时候, 执政团队这里对人民说 : ” nothing for free. ”
    当国际组织根据新加坡的GDP比列平摊捐款时,不知道是否也对他们说 : “ nothing for free ?”

    这不是搞笑行动。
    觉醒吧新加坡 !

  24. 对PAP的看法

    分享一个560万人口的国家, 上个月刚刚发布的明年 ( 2015年 )财政预算,主要内容如下:

    1. 发展援助及庇护费用, 该预算的主要内容如下:
    明年用于庇护申请者的资金将增至3.3亿欧元,这部份资金已经到位。

    2. 卫生领域
    卫生领域将额外增加8,050万欧元的资金用于增加医院产房工作人员,同时减少医院走廊过度拥挤的状况。总体而言,未来四年政府已预留8.7亿欧元用于健康领域。政府已推出了一项计划,将对治疗癌症和慢性疾病提供更多资金,家庭医生的更多待遇也包括其中。

    3. 教育领域
    1.3亿欧元将用于幼儿园和托儿所聘用600位教职人员。
    未来三年,将为公立学校预留1,000万欧元用于帮助学生更好地适应挑战。这些资金将确保更多的特殊教育教师能参与授课,并能给其他教师提供职业洞察力。

    4. 为老人提供护理券
    作为整体2.2亿欧元福利计划的一部份,政府已经决定给老人发放新的家庭护理券。对老人的护理时间每周增加30分钟,老人可以自己决定如何安排。 用于护理券的资金2015年为1,000万欧元,之后每年2015万欧元。

    5. 难民
    全国各地方政府将得到额外3,356万欧元, 用于帮助人数不断增长的难民需求。

    6. 自然和气候领域
    在未来几年中,还有1.3亿欧元主要用于自然、生态和气候方面的举措。在未来四年里,政府还将在气候领域再投入6,040万欧元。这些资金将用于能源生产的新技术,以及减少温室气体排放。

    7. 救济金和相互依靠中心
    未来三年将支出总额不超过1.3亿欧元的资金,以援助得不到失业金或救济金者。

    另一个中心是对救济金领取者设立夫妻相互依靠规定,从而减免救济金的发放。这项规定是在今年一月推出的,也就是说, 生活在一起的未婚夫妇,如果一方失去了工作,需依据此规定,可以从另一方得到经济支持。

    8. 轻轨协议
    该协议包括一笔1.1亿欧元的资金,用于某大学新建一个轻轨项目。该工程将于明年展开,计划在2021年完成。这座轻轨将在东部的一所新大学的医院之间运行。

    9. 社会倾销
    未来四年大约预留1610万欧元用以解决社会倾销问题。政府税务部门、警察以及劳动监察员,将对资金做出高于今年两倍次数的联合检查。

    10. 住房方面
    目前的社会住房法规将被修订,以使普通市民能够负担得起各城市正在建设的数千套新房的房价。此法规的修订意味着今后市政府可以要求:位于海边或在大城市新发展区的兴建新公寓中,有四分之一是公共住房。

  25. 对PAP的看法

    国家有了好的守门人,整个系统才能运转得更高效。

    这里的首相薪水低于全科医生,而全科医生的收入是国民平均收入的四倍, 没有大贫大富。法院是免费服务,100年来没有什么大生意, 偶尔开张一次比如刑事案, 但有史以来没有诽谤案 。

    他们竟然给我也和当地人一样享受免费医疗,免费医疗的其资金主要来源于纳税人的一般税金, 即公民无需缴纳任何专门的医疗保险费用了,而由政府将税收中的部分,直接投入到医疗领域。 ( 扣税后普通国民的最低收入也是新加坡普通人收入的5倍以上。 )

    他们并没有强迫国民支付公积金。

    世界上对国民医疗照顾好的国家很多, 比如英国,称之为全民健康服务体系(NHS), 是世界上规模最大的免费医疗制度。还有俄罗斯,免费医疗仍可以说是最高效的医疗制度之一。

    比如印度,宪法规定国民看病免费,印度宪法中明确规定,所有国民都享受免费医疗。到公立医院看病,药费、挂号费、检查费、就诊费甚至营养餐都免费。但由于政府对医疗拨款有限,公立医院常供不应求。这导致大批国民转向私人医院。

    比如加拿大的全民免费医疗保健体制也被视为世界上最好体制之一。其资金主要来源于税收,联邦政府直接向各省、区划拨部分经费,剩下的由各省、区分担。加政府在医疗卫生上的投入占GDP10%左右,家庭医生平均年薪约20万美元。

    比如古巴,GDP有一成用于免费医疗。 古巴实行真正意义上的免费医疗,门诊、住院、买药均不需花钱。古巴政府医疗投入占GDP10%左右。在医院,从体检、到核磁共振等全部免费。手术费用、医药费以及住院费也全免。

  26. 对PAP的看法

    人口与新加坡一样多,100岁到110岁的健康老人有超过1000位人数以上。人们从来不翻脸, 社会气氛宽容和谐, 即使超级市场的收营员算错了帐,多收了大约25新币的钱。他们也说没关系, 绝不为此返回投诉 。

    假日里一群朋友出海捕鱼, 经过一天风吹日晒后捕上来几条大大小小的鱼,满心欢喜, 但在返回港口之前,又把鱼送回了大海, 空手而归。

    他们有一些不同之处, 值得学习与借鉴, 比如:

    1. 官员请客不报公帐。

    为避免圣诞节不影响大家的私人时间, 一年一度的常年晚宴,被安排在每年11月的最后一个周末。 (今年是11月29日)

    除了首相没有到场,其他该来的都来了。无论多少部长被邀请, 主席是掏自己的腰包, 一切花费不报公帐。 他们的字典里没有“记公帐”这个词。 因为“您”请吃被记了公帐, 就是对没有被请吃的纳税人部分的窃取。 (人们赚了钱, 拿出来交税, 是为了帮助老人和小孩, 失业者,病人,教育等等。不是帮助“您”请吃的 )。

    2. 官方没有“发名片”这种事。

    出席晚宴的人,没有一个人是有名片的, 当然没有交换名片这种事。也没有搞关系的需求。因为给财政拨款与否, 不是某个人决定的。是经过各党派投票在国会上讨论后,被写在一年一度的国家财政预算里面的。

    3. 部长, 议员并不是“中心”, 也没有被“包围”。

    有个部长, 被冷落在一边,没人搭理。 据说因为他提倡的政策并不受欢迎。亚洲心态的我, 很想走过去请他签名或彼此认识一下,我被阻止,没有必要这么做。

    4. 无论是官是民, 都受到同等的尊重。

    在济济一堂的宴会厅里, 一位夫人举杯并主动地对我说 :“ 你好, 我是……刚才在讲话的那位议员的妻子。” —- 我无比感动于眼前这位夫人的谦卑, 平易近人 ,没有距离, 我一时不敢信, 我受到礼貌对待 。

    不 一会儿, 一位个子大约有1.85cm高的帅哥带着身边的一位美女向我走来, 他也自我介绍:“ 我是 ….. 是主席的大儿子, 这位是我太太….这是我的2个小孩 ….. ”, 我看到他们身后跟随着一对活泼可爱的大约3岁左右的小朋友。 —- 喔, 按照我们传统名次排位, 我应该主动地自我介绍才对。 但是作为晚宴上唯一的一个“外国人” , 我一直以“旁观者”的照相机眼睛一清二楚地把场景摄入眼帘 : Dignity, liberty, equality: A fundamental rights triangle of constitutionalism

    恭维巴结的人在这里还没有出世。

    5. 座位把夫妻分开

    我们夫妻和其他夫妻一样被拆开了就坐。按照名字入席。 先喝热过的红酒, 里面有葡萄干之类的东西, 再吃西餐。每一道菜, 都没有被浪费。 席间, 我被他们问以前被不同的人问过的旧话题 :“ 新加坡和这里有什么不同呢 ?”

    我的思绪离开一会儿去了新加坡。

    我不能只顾吃而忘记了新加坡。

    我希望新加坡给每一个国人都有家园, 每张口都有面包, 每个心灵都受到尊重,每个人的智慧都机会发展

  27. 对PAP的看法

    在新加坡的时候,我直肠慢慢地长起了一个肿瘤,还有胃溃疡,脑溢血,冠心病等多种疾病,没有获得药物与治疗,投诉无门, 我也瞬间想跳楼自杀。 生命垂危之际, 他们国家给我全部免费的住院医疗 ,还有家人对我的照顾, 逐步康复。

    我坐下来写这一段天上人间的两种体验,以纠正媒体对西方的错误报道:

    1.他们的孩子, 从出世到大学, 每个月收到国家发口粮的钱 , 比新加坡最低月薪的工人还要多。—- 这就是为什么人家小孩从来不拿父母的钱。

    以前,我们媒体报道是,外国人不管小孩啦,小孩很小就自立啦, 其实人家小孩拿到的钱是和大人一样多的, 就没有谁养谁, 谁要吃谁的问题。

    2.从幼儿园到大学, 是完全免费的。如读大学不住在家里, 每月收到在读期间的生活费, 一直发到读完书为止。

    3. 免费看医生,免费住医院,免费做检查 。 凡是欧盟成员国,在欧洲任何一个国家,生病后, 看医生, 住医院都获得免费。比较亚洲人的东盟, 只谈什么 constructive, 一派空谈。

    4. 工作以后,如果被裁员, 每月可拿与工作时同样的薪水,一直拿到找到下一份工作为止。—- 以前,媒体报道欧洲失业严重,其实他们没有讲,人家失业后还是继续有钱拿回家的。而且和做工时拿的钱一样多。最多可以拿5年,之后只发基本生活费, 每月不低于2000元新币, 确保每个人住得起,吃得起。

    5. 如果找不到工,又想学习木工,绘画,缝纫, 跳舞, 做糕点, 幼儿教育等等, 凡是有一技之长的课程,政府除了提供免费学习 1- 4年的课程。还发放在学习期间每月生活费。 一直发到学本事的课程结业为止。

    6. 法律规定每周工作37个小时。并享有6周的年假。渡假时每人每年还发渡假费。

    7. 每个65以上的人如果继续愿意工作, 不但月薪不变,还有额外收到国家每年发放15万奖励金, 一致发到本人愿意退休为止。

    8. 老人无论过去是否有工作, 都收到一笔养老金。 一直发到死亡为止。死亡后还发安葬费。他们住的独家公寓, 由国家付房85%的租金。政府委派公司负责每周上门一次, 帮老人洗澡,清理房间。 —- 以前,媒体报道说, 外国老人不被小孩照顾,被遗弃。 也是谎报真相.

    8. 救护车, 直升飞机, 频繁救人。没有向人们收一毛钱。

    以前,媒体总是批判西方,说人家快要倒闭了, 其实自以为是,井底之蛙 。蠢蛋。

    9. 如果工作地点的距离超过20公里,政府补贴全部车马费。

    10. 从5年纪开始。 每个学生收到一台免费 laptop。 还有很多……

    他们宁可放弃奥运会主办权, 也要先把每个国民的日常生活安排好。

    一言难尽啊,好比发生在另外一个星球上, 住了这么久, 我依然不敢相信自己的眼睛……连我读书的课程也享受3年的免费,切切实实地受惠于我。 西方制度是最好的制度,西方的月亮就是圆。

  28. 对PAP的看法

    根据维基百科以下資訊以2012年估計, 并做經濟實力比较:

    1)
    新加坡: 國內生產總值 總計:3275.57亿美元 (排名世界第38名), 人均:61,046美元(排名第3名)

    2)
    我在住国 ( 560万人口): 國內生產總值 總計:2101.47億美元 ( 排名世界第52名), 人均:37,657美元 ( 排名第20名)

    比较后得出的结论:

    1. 新加坡有足够的财务能力对内实行全民福利制度的保障。包括向老人发放养老金,向孩子,失业人员发放生活费
    2. 新加坡对国际社会有足够的责无旁贷的捐款义务。 把多余的钱全部捐出来。 最终都是这条路。
    3. 人家經濟實力不如新加坡的国家, 都把不是自己的公民照顾的无微不至,新加坡当局需要长志气 。

  29. 对PAP的看法

    新加坡总理办公室团队总是在别人提出批评的时候, 紧跟一句:

    ” it’s just for meet your agenda ”

    1. 这种不通过大脑思考的官方发言人,体现了新加坡公务员素质欠佳, 今天拿出来聊一聊。

    2. what agenda ? 难道各界民众还有升职 , 加薪 , 竞选总理, 为个人捞好处 的 agenda 吗 ?

    这些都不是民众 agenda. 而是总理办公室人的 agenda 嘛。

    3. 为了达到个人提拔,加薪,竞选, 捞好处, 拿到仅次于总理的第二等天价薪水的目地,不惜代价, 诋毁民众,谎报真相,把总理引入歧途。 在国家与民众对立起来,这些人并不负任何政府责任。

    必须承认,在现代政府的行政管理中,需要借鉴西方国家的一些成功的经验。高级公务员需要接受课程培训

    4. 当年,比尔 克林顿上任后的第一件事,就是对他主要的行政人员进行团队建设培训。请2位专家帮助新内阁成员进行和谐相处,提高工作效率。 2位专家要求内阁成员带上他们的简历, 并谈一谈他们生活中令人振奋的经历。 在一次讨论会上,2位专家又请他们谈一谈在简历中没有提到的重大个人时件, 轮到克林顿时, 这位新总统告诉大家,童年时, 他是个小胖子, 别的孩子都嘲笑他。

    这种团队建设训练的目地让团员们理解,自己应该如何应用自己的个性特征为群体做出贡献。 有素质效率的团队,懂得注重信息反馈,团结民众, 作出调整, 获得民众的认同。 以开放的态度听取倾诉, 即使面对批评,不满, 也要表示欢迎。这才是一个朝气蓬勃的团队

    相反,控告民众, 或给人民内部矛盾定罪, 都是政府带头违法乱纪的表现。新加坡如果在镇压人民方面和香港竞争, 就是在竞争世界上排名第一的最坏的团队。

    4. 我们回过来再看一看民众有什么 agenda 呢 ?除了希望长命百岁, 身体健康, 家庭幸福, 适应公务员的那一套提拔,加薪,竞选, 捞好处的 agenda 都与老百姓世世代代毫不相干。

    5. 然而在新加坡, 政府很难协助国人去实现国民长命百岁, 身体健康, 家庭幸福这个很基本的生存 agenda, 比如, 失去工作,工会保障制度还没有建立起来, 被总理起诉, 国家公平机制也没有建立起来, 这都给国人带来无形的巨大压力,抵抗能力弱的人,很快就自杀了,社会保障机能也没有建立起来, 怎么能帮助国人实现长命百岁, 身体健康, 家庭幸福这个很基本的生存 agenda 呢 ?

  30. 对PAP的看法

    从新加坡形成的历史来看,虽然马来人割让领土不是割给一个人, 毋庸置疑,没有李光耀,便没有新加坡。
    这一点后代们其实已经把淡马锡, 李氏家族等作为有功之臣的应得在人之常情的范围之内。

    根据观察, 新加坡有一批中间人, 有机会接近领袖, 介于领袖与人民之间的人, 他们最先搭顺风车, 最快致富, 本来他们仅值一盘炒粿条的价值, 很快滴与建国功臣平起平坐,享受老资格, 他们常常首先伤害国人,却嫁祸于领袖 。他们希望功臣们百年之后, 他们立刻接班,毫不费力地获得天价薪水的继承待遇。

    要使新加坡人们解除痛苦,化解领袖与民众的误解,首先要杜绝这批肩客, 解散他们的权利。有一个办法, 就是还权于民, 让民众选出他们各自的代表, 比如 Roy 和 Xmen 都可以被总理利用起来, 为国效劳。

  31. 对PAP的看法

    记得有一次, 一位老汉向某议员泼硫酸, 老汉被抓,李光耀到医院看议员。
    表面上看老汉犯下伤人罪, 罪有应得。 深层追究,这位老汉一生过得好不好 ? 日积月累下火候慢慢升上了天。 中间人管道从政府那里拿了钱, 没有做事, 或只做一点皮毛 ,老汉的生死杀机就在中间的管道里。

    还有,一位老汉涂鸦被抓去坐牢,哎呀, 对一个快要死的人, 有没有快要死的政策呢 ?或给他一个警告 ?
    表面上看,捉了一个涂鸦老汉,深沉上分析,谁惹老汉了,难道是建国功臣亲自下手吗 ?绝不可能。 又是中间管道的人。 他们拿了巨款,回家睡觉了。结果呢, 老汉将死在监狱里。 看到这条新闻的人, 对老汉是心痛的。

    希望明年国家50岁生日那天, 对这批老汉实行 “ 皇恩大赦 ”。

  32. 对PAP的看法

    前天, 我分享了一个纯洁,谦逊,守时和社会平等的人间完美之地的感动之处,有几个方面我忘记写了:

    1. 如果夫妻有一方是没有工作的外国人, 每月也收到政府发放的一份口粮, 大约700 新币左右, 不过是 bank in 去有工作那一方的银行户口里面。 在这里没有“ 省吃俭用 ” 的说法, 确保每张口都有饭吃, 每个人都吃饱饭, 按照每个登记人口号码发放一份口粮, 而不是由一方从自己的口中省下一口,给另一方。

    2. 外国工作准证人士的小孩,如果居住在这里满6个月, 享受50%当地孩子的口粮, 满2年,享有100%与当地孩子一样的口粮, 孩子越多,发放的越多。只要有居民身份证的外国人,看病, 住院, 与本地人一样全部免费。宁享受欧盟医疗卡待遇。

    3. 外国人 住满3年,有选举权。他们对我们华人比华人领袖对华人好上一千倍。

    4. 去年电视上看到, 他们国会在讨论今年给猪的福利也增加了。 我又没有听错啊 ? 连畜生都享有福利吗 ?
    没有听错, 要让国民吃到健康不生病的猪肉, 他们要给猪补钙, 住房的温度要适当等等。

    5. 他们的女王出访, 并没有乘坐专机, 而是只做头等舱。 有时为了节省,还选用其他国家的航班。 中间又被转机。他们的优秀品德, 无与伦比, 为天地之动, 但从来不争排名。

    6. 皇室的两个儿子,都先后娶了普通平民女孩 …… 每年皇室的费用也经过国会讨论通过……

    他们多次被评为世界上最快乐的国家, 他们的快乐, 因为有个很好,很愿意照顾人们的皇室, 还有不追求名利, 地位, 财富的政府。

    我曾经编辑了这感动亚洲人的画册, 提前通过电子邮件,发给新加坡的李总理。
    我现在才知道,那个邮箱是虚设的。 当事人根本不看,那个邮箱的作用没有了。

  33. 对PAP的看法

    (联合早报网讯)为了贯彻“温情的任人唯贤制度”等与时并进的价值观,人民行动党将把去年推出的决议纳入党章。

    行动党今晚在博览中心设晚宴招待3000名党员,……
    2013年决议的六大重点是加强新加坡人的认同感、为所有新加坡人创造机会、维持开放又具同情心的任人唯贤制度、建设一个公平和公正的社会、制定以行动为主的民主机制,以及成为应对得当并负责任的政府。 – See more at: http://www.zaobao.com.sg/realtime/singapore/story20141122-415102#sthash.oZsWW0NC.dpuf

    ………………………………

    人们把 “ 为所有新加坡人创造机会、维持开放又具同情心的任人唯贤制度、建设一个公平和公正的社会、制定以行动为主的民主机制,以及成为应对得当并负责任的政府。” — 看做建房子。 在建造一幢有质量的房子之前。 要公开 ” 招标 “。 看哪一个党派同样也可以做到以上品质保证以外。 并且提供更低的成本, 每年为国家节省资源, 并将做得更多 。 把节省下来的部分, 比如给老人什么实惠 ? 给穷人家庭带来什么 ? 给言论自由的保障 ? 给失业国民的补贴……谁做得到,就标给谁。每四年为一届, 做不到就下台。 让给有本事做到的党派。

    建议国家可以通过修宪, 根据李光耀对新加坡共和国形成的独立贡献,其家族成员可以享有皇室待遇, 并永远不变。

    其他官员的产生与待遇,都应根据市场, 由民主制度来决定。包括对在野党生命财产的保护, 都必须立法。为新加坡真正了意义上的第一世界, 奠定基础。迟早都要这样做。

  34. you

    Heart Truths, I been to Palmerston North, Manawatu-Wanganui, New Zealand about Number 1: Dong Sheng Rangitikei Street, Number 2: The Plaza Shopping Centre and Number 3: Pak‘n Save on Sunday 30 November 2014. So now I think I cannot go to Singapore forever because that is no used, and the only way is go anywhere else in New Zealand about Tauranga, Whakatane, Gisborne, Greymouth and any other places by buying a house. So now Heart Truths, Europe, United States, China, Japan and New Zealand, now try have a biggest fight to get all the money out from 22 Country: Brunei, Cambodia, East Timor, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Burma, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam, Southeast Asia, South America, (Central America), Australia, South Asia, Western Asia, Central Asia, Africa, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan into 5 Country: Europe, United States, China, Japan and New Zealand for every month. Because we want 1 Country rates dollars up now: New Zealand and the 4 Country rates dollars must be up now: United States, China, Europe and Japan.

  35. teoenming

    Singapore Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew and Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong Want Teo En Ming Dead

    Singapore Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew and Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong want Teo En Ming dead. Lee Kuan Yew and Lee Hsien Loong want Teo En Ming to die young.

    Teo En Ming filed an official complaint against the Singapore Government at the United Nations Human Rights Council Branch and the International Criminal Court. Read the letter here:

    Teo En Ming’s Open Letter (Plea for Medical Help/Assistance) to World Leaders. Read the letter here:

    http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/mpich-discuss/2010-August/007811.html

    Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
    Singapore Citizen
    22 December 2014

  36. 传奇开sf一条龙开区服务

    英雄王座travia服务端暗黑修仙服务端仙境传说ro服务端弹弹堂服务端
    冒险岛私服开服奇迹mu私服开服传奇外传私服开服风云无双私服开服神迹私服开服
    真封神开区一条龙惊天动地开区一条龙红月开区一条龙魔力宝贝开区一条龙飞飞务开区一条龙
    传奇开sf一条龙开区服务 http://www.e7if.com/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s