The Prime Minister’s Secretary can Sue Me for Saying She Lied about Me or Apologise Immediately

IMG_6367

After the pre-trial conference (PTC) for the defamation suit on Monday, the prime minister’s secretary lied about what my lawyer and I said. Yesterday, she released another statement to continue to distort the truth to put words into my mouth.

On Monday, a PTC was held to decide on the dates for the hearing on how much in damages I would need to pay the prime minister. The prime minister has filed for the defamation suit in the high court which oversees cases of more than $250,000, which means that I would be looking at losing at least this amount. The hearing dates have not been set.

On Monday, after the PTC, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s press secretary Chang Li Lin sent out a press statement and said, “Mr Ngerng’s lawyer indicated at the hearing that Mr Ngerng did not want to be cross-examined.”

She lied. This is not true.

I have never uttered the words, “I do not want to be cross-examined.” I have also never said this in any other reiterations.

Yesterday, when the prime minister’s secretary was exposed to have lied, she did not apologise but continued to try to distort the truth to insist that I did not want to be cross-examined.

However, she changed her statement after being caught lying with her pants down.

This time, she said, “This was the clearest indication that Mr Ngerng did not want to be cross-examined.”

From making an assertion that “I do not want” to be cross-examined, Ms Chang now changed her statement to say that “this was the clearest indication”.

It is now revealed all and sundry that the prime minister’s secretary has lied.

She knows that I have never said that I do not want to be cross-examined and she knew that she has lied. And now she is trying to wriggle her way out.

The fact of the matter is that I have always stood ready to be cross-examined.

Ms Chang is the one who is uncertain if the prime minister would do so similarly as well.

On Monday, she was the one who changed her statement from saying that the prime minister was ready to be cross-examined “right from the beginning” to only being “ready to be cross-examined, a position he has earlier communicated to the Court”.

Not only that, yesterday, Ms Chang pointed to “notes” taken from the prime minister’s lawyers to try to justify that I did not want to be cross-examined.

However, in a statement my lawyer released this afternoon, M Ravi also said that nowhere in the “notes” released by Ms Chang did they say, “Mr Ngerng’s lawyer indicated at the hearing that Mr Ngerng did not want to be cross-examined,” nor did they say anything like it.

The prime minister’s secretary lied.

When I attended the hearing on Monday,  I was advised by the judge to report on the case objectively, otherwise I could be charged with contempt of court.

It is now clear that the prime minister’s secretary has lied and has not reported on court proceedings accurately.

It is clear that Ms Chang has now been found in contempt of court. I believe that it is the due process for the court to charge the prime minister’s secretary for contempt of court.

Next, I would also challenge the prime minister’s secretary to sue me for defamation if what I have said about her lying about what I said is not true. Otherwise, the prime minister’s secretary would do well to carry an apology to me in all state-controlled media platforms, including on print, online, TV and radio.

It is disingenuous of the prime minister’s secretary to lie about what I have said when she knows, and the prime minister’s lawyers know as well, that I have never said that I do not want to be cross-examined.

That the prime minister’s secretary would put words into my mouth shows how insidious and treacherous she is in wanting to use state resources to pull my character, reputation and integrity down.

May I remind Ms Chang that she works for the highest office of the land. It is expected of her to hold herself in an upright manner and with integrity. Where Ms Chang would blatantly lie when she knows the truth not only puts the highest office of the land to shame but it also sets a humiliating example to Singaporeans and the public service as to how a top public servant should conduct and behave.

The prime minister’s secretary’s actions have called into the integrity of the public service.

May I remind her that her direct supervisor, the prime minister, had said yesterday at the ‘”Integrity in Action” Public Service Values Conference’ that, “we trust the Public Service to act with integrity, always in the public interest.”

“So first of all, the leadership must set the tone and continue to set the tone from the top all the way down, and act with integrity,” he had also said.

If the prime minister’s own secretary does not even have the integrity to uphold herself, then I believe our public service is in serious trouble.

The prime minister would do well to discipline his office and set an example by putting his office in order. His secretary’s actions are horrendous and disgraceful and is not befitting of the highest office in the land. I do not believe that we need to continue to see such derisory behaviour be ejaculated from his office.

The prime minister should also set an example by apologising to me on his secretary’s behalf. Don’t worry, I will not send a prepared apology letter like you had sent to me to make me put up on my blog, then have the state-controlled media mischievously mis-quote me on it.

May I also remind the prime minister’s secretary that it was her direct supervisor, the prime minister, who had initially wanted a closed-door trial for the hearing on the damages and that it has always been I who had wanted an open hearing, in the name of public interest.

May I also remind the prime minister’s secretary that it was also her direct supervisor, the prime minister, who had wanted me to submit the questions for cross-examination so that they would be able to know what my lawyers would want to ask in the actual trial beforehand.

Ms Chang, before you point your finger at someone else, please look at the number of fingers that are pointing back at you.

If the prime minister is to expect the public service and Singaporeans to carry themselves with integrity, it might be more appropriate and convincing if the prime minister gets his own house in order.

As if it is not bad enough that I am faced with the stress and pressure of having a legal suit sent directly by the prime minister and have the whole of the state machinery train its resources to prosecute and attack me, I do not need another barefaced lie from the prime minister’s secretary, no less.

Advertisements

42 comments

  1. Pingback: DID LEE HSIEN LOONG'S PRESS SECRETARY LIE AND THEN TRY TO COVER IT UP? - www.hardwarezone.com.sg
  2. thepress

    “The prime minister would do well to discipline his office and set an example by putting his office in order. His secretary’s actions are horrendous and disgraceful and is befitting of the highest office in the land. I do not believe that we need to continue to see such derisory behaviour be ejaculated from his office.”

    They are good at masturbating so don’t count on any kind of discipline on their side not to publicly ejaculate any more.

  3. John Smith

    “As if it is not bad enough that I am faced with the stress and pressure of having a legal suit sent directly by the prime minister and have the whole of the state machinery train its resources to prosecute and attack me”

    Oh, continuing to act the martyr, are we? Like you didn’t bring all these “stress and pressure” on yourself by making false allegations against LHL (you admitted this and the court agrees, don’t you dare to deny). Or are you hinting that the PAP enticed you to make such baseless allegations with its laws, policies and “secret agents”?

    You are living under the constant delusion that you are actually a thorn in the PAP’s side and they are all out to get you – a symptom of Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD). Please get off your high horse; you are not as important as you think and accordingly, you are not a threat to them. You are simply a willing source of charity funds to them. Only LHL is suing you, not “the whole of the state machinery”.

    But I guess, this denial is yet another manifestation of your inability to accept that you are wrong. Your ability to assume that you are correct and smarter than others is indeed amazing – as shown by your behaviour after posting the apology, thinking that you wouldn’t get caught.

      • You Fucking Stupid or What

        You kumgong or what? You too suaku to know that John Smith is a generic name like Mary Sue for people who don’t want to give their full name ah?

  4. SIMPLE

    Ms Chang
    “Mr Ngerng’s lawyer indicated at the hearing that Mr Ngerng did not want to be cross-examined.”

    Mr Ngerng
    “I have never uttered the words, “I do not want to be cross-examined.” I have also never said this in any other reiterations. ”

    Ms Chang said you were not in court that day, so how can you be uttering or not uttering these words.
    It is Mr Ngerng’ s lawyer, that indicate.
    Ms Chang was also not there. This inference come from the notes that Mr Ngerng lawyer himself said its true.
    So what lie did Ms Chang said?

    Mr Ngerng
    “It is disingenuous of the prime minister’s secretary to lie about what I have said when she knows, and the prime minister’s lawyers know as well, that I have never said that I do not want to be cross-examined.
    That the prime minister’s secretary would put words into my mouth shows how insidious and treacherous she is in wanting to use state resources to pull my character, reputation and integrity down. ”

    Simple “Cool down, so you want be cross-examine. You make yr point very clear.”

    Ms Chang said you were not in court. So how can she put word in your mouth when you are not there. The lawyer represent you , she only infer from the notes. The only thing you can said is like yr lawyer did, her inference is wrong and illogical

    She don’t have to sue you for calling her a liar when she is not.

  5. SIMPLE

    As if it is not bad enough that I am faced with the stress and pressure of having a legal suit sent directly by the prime minister and have the whole of the state machinery train its resources to prosecute and attack me.

    Roy wake up, you are already guilty as charged. You are fighting a suit.

  6. SIMPLE

    Roy there are 3 statements that you claimed that “The state-controlled media also lied by carrying her statement.”

    1. “Mr Ngerng’s lawyer indicated at the hearing that Mr Ngerng did not want to be cross-examined,” Ms Chang said.

    2. “The judge directed his lawyer to confirm whether he would be giving evidence by 30 January 2015.

    3. “PM Lee stands ready to be cross-examined, a position he has earlier communicated to the Court,” state-controlled media also reported.

    “However, this is not true.”

    Statement 2 is also not true?

  7. Eyewitness

    PM LEE ? HIS MENTAL HAS A PROBLEM ? HIS OWN CASE HE IS MORE CLEAR THAN HIS STAFF . WHY HE NEVER TURN UP ? HE IS A SPECIAL NEEDS MAN ? HE HAS SUSPECTED OF DERELICTION OF DUTY. HIS LIBEL CASE SHOULD BE INADMISSIBLE. BECAUSE HE DEFILED THE PEOPLE OF SINGAPORE. HE IS A HYPOCRITICAL PERSON, HIS SECRETARY ALSO SEEMED ROBBER FOR MONEY ,PM LEE WORK WITH HIS MAD WOMAN TOGETHER HAND IN HAND. BOTH THEY CREATED A LOT OF TROUBLE FOR SINGAPOREANS. WE FED UP .
    DO URGE HIM AND HIS WOMAN GIVE BACK TEMASEK AND THE RULING .BOTH THEM STEP DOWN STRAIGHTAWAY

  8. Winson

    Roy, why don’t you sue the PM sec if you think she maligned you ? People expose your lies one time after another and you are just savaging yourself by continuing to use more lies to over up your lies. There is only one ending for you. You deserve it.

  9. Somebody

    I read the Press Secretary’s reply. She has the transcript. She is correct when she wrote:
    “Mr Ngerng’s lawyer indicated at the hearing that Mr Ngerng did not want to be cross-examined.”

    It is a statement of fact. But it does not tell the full story.

    Subsequent transcript shows clearly, after prodding by the judge that M. Ravi would consult with Roy whether to be cross-examined and revert back by 30 Jan. The PM’s secretary is NOT lying, but is obviously trying to MISLEAD the public with a factual statement to paint a negative picture on Roy.

    It reminds me of willy cunning foxes. Since she has the full transcript, she shouldn’t be quoting out of context based on certain statements made when she is aware that such statements would mislead the public into thinking that Roy did not want to be cross-examined.

    And Roy, for your part, you shouldn’t be trying to sensationalise this by saying that she is lying. Instead, you could have used “quoted out of context” to be accurate. Let’s not play the same game that they play. The PM has zero credibility as a leader, you shouldn’t be learning from him.

    • SIMPLE

      SOMEBODY SAID “Subsequent transcript shows clearly, after prodding by the judge that M. Ravi would consult with Roy whether to be cross-examined and revert back by 30 Jan”.

      key word was “after prodding by the judge”. What if the judge didn’t prod?

      • Someone

        That’s why the outcome is important, not any passing statement made during the PTC. In this case, the PM is clearly trying to mislead the public by allowing his press secretary to publish such sneaky statements. To me, from this episode, we can see what sort of person he is. I won’t say Roy is faultless, but who is the bigger evil?

    • Roy's friend

      Roy,

      Listen to Ravi. He knows best. That’s why he’s clearly very reluctant to see you cross-examined. Because he knows your character. You’ll just dig yourself a deeper grave if you must face questions yourself. Look at all your outbursts and excuses all the way from before HLP heckling right up to the above article.

      You don’t know what’s good for you. Ravi knows better from his legal experience. He also knows you. Better to listen to him. Many of your articles and outbursts don’t make any sense and are indefensible logically and legally.

      Take care.

      Regards,
      your friend

  10. The Oracle

    As usual Roy is digging himself a deeper and deeper hole. He’s up to his neck in s**t already and still can’t stop himself. One word: Fool.

  11. President Teo En Ming, Federation of the Universe

    Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew and Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong of Singapore Want Teo En Ming Dead

    Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew and Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong of Singapore want Teo En Ming dead. Lee Kuan Yew and Lee Hsien Loong want Teo En Ming to die young. I am only 36 years old. I do not want to die young. I want to live to a hundred years old and beyond!!!

    In fact, I want to live forever!!! I want to be an immortal!!!

    Teo En Ming has filed an official complaint against the Singapore Government at the United Nations Human Rights Council Branch and the International Criminal Court. Read the letter here:

    ***********************************************************************************
    ***********************************************************************************
    ***********************************************************************************
    ***********************************************************************************
    ***********************************************************************************
    ***********************************************************************************
    ***********************************************************************************
    =========================================================================
    =========================================================================

    Mr. Teo En Ming’s Open Letter (Plea for Medical Help/Assistance) to World Leaders dated 27 August 2010. The letter dated 27 August 2010 is the most recent letter! Read the letter here:

    http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/mpich-discuss/2010-August/007811.html

    Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
    Singapore Citizen
    Republic of Singapore
    14 Jan 2015 Wednesday Singapore Time

    Random Numbers:
    5991226664174120566897458593272004578251204579124563047892127852296200417896323459612598522005969743312889652122566045789925278522002368454125782526598552524152000565

    Random Characters:
    kjfdsufjjdfvnkjvfhuiewryewpalafhdsfsdofdsjhjhqurfybvnlzpqp[apokmndfhsfdshujqhnxzxnqsxncgbijgp

  12. Red carpet

    You got yourself to be blamed for not being the grandson of LKY or at least the nephew of some white mongrels. You are just the son of some carrot cake.

  13. Xmen

    As usual, the whole PAP IB is here. Here are my few humble questions –

    How did PSPM Ms Chang obtain the PRIVILEDGED attorney client notes from Drew & Napier, Mr LHL? Isn’t this a private lawsuit between you and Roy? How did your PRIVILEDGED and PRIVATE notes become so PUBLICLY and FREELY available to your press secretary and MSM? Why is your office so PUBLICLY and FREELY issuing press releases on your PRIVATE AFFAIR? Is this an ABUSE of PUBLIC resource?

    Btw, is your offer of being cross examined dependent on being provided the questions prior to cross examination?! LOL.

  14. Ann

    Roy, you still don’t want to take down this post alleging the PM lied, not afraid kena sued again? C’mon la, you have been played like a fiddle by Ravi. tsk tsk tsk

  15. Nick Lim

    Hi Roy,
    Fantastic piece. You have just hit a nail on the head as far as political hypocrisy in Singapore, and in particular the PAP. Like all dictatorships, their day in history will come and you will be remembered for all the sacrifices you are facing now.

  16. statement

    who paid LHL’s secretary monthly income ?
    is it LHL’s own wallet ?
    PM LHL against his job description no distinguish between personal affairs and national affairs ?

    Obviously, in the first month of 2015, PM LHL He committed a new offense again – misuse of authority , jobbery.

    last year, gangs organiser extorting , threaten the safety of people’s life,
    whatever counting or calculating, he always kept fighting for the ground of immodest & dishonest,

    his ruling is Singapore’s darkest days.

    Singapore needs a new leader replace him .

    meanwhile, we would like to pay tribute to those who speak on behalf of the ordinary people of Singapore .

  17. statement

    Mr. prime minister lee,

    before you used your father fight for you
    today you used that woman fight for you

    you even would not use your own ability or courage to fight for yourself,
    how people believe when you swear to fight for Singapore ?

    if useless person occupied the key post for wasting national resources.
    in the end, we demanding government audit and publish the financial statements of Temasek .how much lost, how much earn, how much payback to its original account account – CPF .

    if you have no plan to do it, that you and your wife misappropriated people’s CPF
    the irrefutable facts that become the corruption case has long been established in people’s judgement.

  18. statement

    libel or no libel must let Lee Kuan Yew and Lee Hsien Loong both do a lie detector test :

    let both them swear to God.

    Affidavit face to Jesus Christ or the Buddha or Hinduism and the Heaven

    that ” we, Lee Kuan Yew and Lee Hsien Loong in charge the Temasek holding had never been received any coin transfer from CPF account , if we are lying we step down immediately and pay back Roy Ngerng Yi Ling and all Singaporeans the all losses, we accept any of punishment given by Gods and Heaven ”

    if they do so, Singaporeans vote for him forever in charge Singaporeans money, pension, everything .

    if they declined to do so, the libel case is a completely blackmail case !

  19. aaaaa

    大人物和市井小民打官司,既使给大人物赢了官司大人物却输了尊严。
    鄞小弟面对这样的官司,当然要微笑置之,不然耍鄞小弟哭丧着面吗?

    大人物年收入二百万元,诽谤赔偿是二十万元,是大人物身家的十分之一。
    鄞小弟现在因官司失业,若身上只有二千元,你身家的十分之一是二百元。
    以此逻辑,若你判有罪,你只须赔偿二百元而以,因为你的十分之一身家是二百元等于大人物十分之一身家的二十万元。

    若官司过了,你应该找大人物给你找工作。大人物心胸应宽大可戴一艘大船,应不会拒绝你的耍求。
    记得过去找大人物给你找一份工作。耍常常去找, 直到大人物给你找一份好工作为止。

    以小人物的能力有限,你应该找总统帮你问。
    若这一届的总统没法帮你问到你耍的,那你就请下届总统帮你如何。

    你是平凡的小人物,就由大人物去问大人物吧!

  20. Roy's friend

    Roy,

    How’s the YMCA children? Did you ever show concern for them these few months? How about during Christmas? Or you not interested anymore? The kids are no longer newsworthy to you already? I see you’ve moved on to greater things now. Be careful don’t walk into a another of your so-called “trap” (which you yourself set up for your own self like that other time at HLP).

    Take care.

    Regards,
    Your friend

  21. Name is as fake as everyone else's

    You deserved to be sued, and I am writing this not because I like the PAP, but I think you are a disgrace.

  22. Pingback: The $29,000 has been Paid to Lee Hsien Loong’s Lawyers from Drew & Napier | The Heart Truths
  23. President Teo En Ming, Federation of the Universe

    [YOUTUBE VIDEO] Launch of the Singapore Democratic Party Economic Policy Paper by Dr. Chee Soon Juan on 7 Feb 2015 Saturday

    Dear Citizens of the World,

    I have just completed uploading my video coverage of the presentation by Dr. Chee Soon Juan to Youtube at 6:25 PM SGT. Video rendering on my Intel Core i5 4430 desktop computer took a solid 4 hours for a 2 hr video. Youtube may take another 10 hours to process my video before it becomes online. Please wait patiently for my Youtube video. The presentation by Dr. Chee Soon Juan started at 2:00 PM SGT on 7 Feb 2015 Sat. I was late for the presentation by 45 minutes due to another important matter that I had taken up. I am very very sorry for being late.

    Filmed by Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
    Singapore Citizen
    8 Feb 2015 Sunday Singapore Time GMT+8 / UTC+8

    COPYRIGHT NOTICE:

    COPYRIGHT © 2015 TEO EN MING (ZHANG ENMING)
    SINGAPORE +65-9117-5902

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s