Punggol East By-Election 2013: The Aftermath and the Analysis

By now, most of Singapore would know that WP’s Lee Li Lian had won the Punggol East by-election and soundly thumped PAP’s Koh Poh Koon.

WP won 54.52% of the votes, whereas PAP could only capture 43.71% of the votes. WP won by a very convincing margin of 10.81%.

This is compared to when WP had won 43.71% of the votes in General Election 2011 and PAP had won 54.54%. How the tide has turned. There was a swing of 13.51 percentage points to WP and a swing of 10.83% away from PAP.

A) Main Takeaway

The most obvious conclusion you need to draw from this by-election is this: It was never about the candidate. It was never about local issues. It has always been about national issues. And it has always been about the parties. Which is why right from the start, DPM Teo Chee Hean had tried to frame the issue as one of local issues, and Koh was pushed forward as his own man, and his infamous tagline, “This Is Me”, which disappeared overnight because PAP knew the next instance that they cannot escape confronting the national issues and party allegiance that Singaporeans are more concerned about. Not also when WP strongly framed national issues at their rallies and reminded Singaporeans to elect another opposition member into parliament to keep PAP in check. And that was why PAP had no choice but to have PM Lee Hsien Loong speak for more than half an hour at PAP’s last rally on national issues. And that was also why PAP announced three announcements pertaining to national issues during the by-election – cooling measures for housing, new MRT train lines and the $2 billion annual parenthood package. Singaporeans didn’t bite. And PAP had to use two of their most popular politicians to also defuse the tensions against PAP. When Madam Halimah Yacob became ‘elected’ as the Speaker of Parliament, a whole section in the Straits Times was dedicated to her, showering her with commendations. PAP also had to activate Dr Amy Khor to speak at their last rally. Still, to no avail, PAP lost.

By all accounts, any missteps by PAP will cost them heavily. During the by-election, they had spoken about ensuring that the Rivervale Plaza will be completed by the middle of 2013 and about how they will add on two more carriages onto the Sengkang LRT to ferry more passengers as election promises. Now, if these proposals don’t come to pass, the residents at Punggol East won’t be putting the blame on the Worker’s Party. They live near enough to their neighbours in Hougang to understand how their neighbours have been systematically marginalised for more than 20 years simply because they value their freedom and dignity. If these proposals do not see the light of day, the residents will vote more resoundingly for the Worker’s Party at General Election 2016. So, PAP can’t play any tricks here. And what about the promises about more feeder buses, childcare centres or hawker centres? Frankly, these were non-issues to begin with. Whether these will ever be done is never planned on a local level. There is only as much land in the Punggol East constituency and unless the residents want to remove the only bit of greenery they have, they can perhaps advocate to their MP to put in another market. Issues like this are always planned on a national level. LTA would hardly say that because the MP of an area, be it a PAP MP or a WP MP requests for additional bus services, they would then deploy more bus services just for the few streets that encircle Punggol East. They wouldn’t do that because the routes of bus services have to be planned on a broader geographical scale. It just doesn’t make logical sense to plan for transport routes, or the locations of shopping malls, hawker centres, markets or childcare centres on a local level. There isn’t enough population mass to justify planning on a local level.

And this is also one reason why SDA would never have won. Mr Desmond Lim had focused his campaign right from the start as a campaign on local issue. It was never about local issues. He missed the plot and thus he won far lesser votes than he did at General Election 2011.

B) If anything, this has shown that the Singapore electorate has matured on many fronts:

1) The residents of Punggol East had voted tactically. They knew what was at stake. They knew it was about national issues. As much as mainstream media went around interviewing residents on their concerns and speaking to ‘political observers’ on their insights and therefore highlighting that residents there were concerned about local issues, it was all a charade that the mainstream media had put up. The residents didn’t bite. They knew what was at stake. They knew the responsibility they had in their hands and they knew that because this was a by-election, they can go all out and do what they needed to do. And they did.

2) This has also shown that Singaporeans have become a lot more politically savvy. Not only were they tactical and understood that the by-election should be fought on a national level, they knew that it was about the party (and lesser about the candidate) and they knew that their only true options were between PAP and WP. It didn’t help that RP had went off on an embarrassing start, slighting the other opposition parties and Mr Desmond Lim from SDA made several blunders on his YouTube rally. And the residents were a lot more mindful that they shouldn’t waste their votes – only 521 votes were cast for RP and SDA together, or only 1.77% of the votes.

3) This is not to say that Ms Lee Li Lian won only on the coattails of WP. She won because first, the party had a clear strategy of fielding consistently candidates who they know are committed and who will stay the course. This is in spite of how the mainstream media had tried to play up the idea that WP should have sent in their NMPs, which the media described as more popular. The mainstream media had tried to diffuse WP’s strategy but Mr Low Thia Kiang is wiser than that than to allow the media to shape WP’s long-term strategy. What worked for WP was that they had a clear party strategy, a clear rally strategy, had a clear on-ground strategy and stayed on course. And Singaporeans can see that – WP is determined, consistent and stable. And if you want to become a credible party, you need to show that you have all your guns ready. It’s not about believing – like RP and SDA had. It’s about believing and translating them into real, tangible and visible actions. And that’s where WP got their act altogether and solidly proved to Singaporeans that they have what it takes.

4) Finally, by now, we would all know that clearly, Singaporeans want an alternative voice to represent them. Singaporeans are unhappy. They are unhappy at being made used of, being lied to, not given enough information to, and most importantly, Singaporeans feel trapped in a country where they are not able to do anything, even as they know what’s wrong and what needs to be done. This is something WP has acknowledged. And as much as PAP claimed, after the by-election, that they respect the voters’ choice and that voters might simply want opposition voices, PAP needs to, and they will take seriously, that this means that they need to truly reflect on themselves, their principles and their values and recalibrate their middle ground, or rather, shift in tandem with the people and start prioritising the people’s needs as one of their key agendas. In a democracy, leaders are elected to represent the people, and leaders need to serve the people. It has taken Singaporeans nearly 50 years to get their act together – and start to own some of the power that they had given up on. Of course, PAP can turn around and clamp down on Singaporeans by becoming China or North Korea. Well, they cannot do that – not when they pander to capitalistic influences and not when the very idea that Singapore is grounded on is on an open market system and open lines of global networks.

C) So, what then will the PAP do?

1) Under PM Lee’s watch, he introduced the ‘Cooling Off Day’ as one strategy to hopefully stem the tide of change towards the opposition. The aim is that by having a cooling off day, the mainstream press will be able to define the discourse as one that is aligned to PAP, so that voters might still be swayed by the mainstream press to vote for PAP. Obviously, this did not work for the Punggol East by-election, partly because the mainstream media’s pandering of PAP’s agenda has become so obvious over the past one year that more and more Singaporeans are now relying on online news and sharing to have a broad perspective of what’s really going on. Clearly, PAP’s strategy to limit the growth of the opposition or the protection of their dominance in this new era is also focused strongly on shaping the psychological perspectives of people – what with the cooling off day and shaping of the news on mainstream media. However, they did not catch up with the times. Singaporeans have moved ahead of them.

2) Next, PAP had in the past, employed two other strategies, by rigging the electoral model (i.e. reducing the time period between nomination day and polling day, introducing GRCs etc) and by crippling the opposition management of the estate (i.e. through the introduction of the town councils which the Aim episode has unravelled and the appointment of the PAP representative as the grassroot leaders, even if PAP did not win in the constituency and the residents on the constituency rightfully pay their taxes and they should be the one deciding on who they want representing them – and they’ve voted for the opposition – and how their money should be used.) Now, question is, will PAP further develop systems to remodel the electoral model and cripple the opposition local government without Singaporeans, and the opposition themselves, knowing? We need more anal-retentive probers to do the job and from what the Aim-AHTC episode had exposed, Singaporeans might actually do a better job than Koh when it comes to that.

3) Finally, watch what PAP will do after the review of the town councils. PAP had said that they will review the relevance of the roles of the town councils. And so, how will they review it such that we will ‘dumbly’ accede to their recommendation to remodel it, as we had done so when they introduced the town councils in 1989. Will we allow them to whitewash over us again? Will we let them? Will you let them? If anything, this by-election and the ongoings months prior, beginning from the incident of the SMRT bus drivers, the Aim-AHTC episode and then the by-election, should have awaken many more Singaporeans politically, who should realise now that if they want change to happen, they need to make their voice known, by making their vote useful – as they had just did, by speaking up (and we can only do so freely online for now because our rights to demonstrate peacefully are curtailed) and by rummaging through all information and evidence and putting together a coherent picture of how we might be systematically lied to or marginalised. We have shown ourselves to be capable of doing that, and we will and must continue to do that.

Remember, this is a Singaporeans’ Singapore – not a PAP’s Singapore, not a WP’s Singapore but a Singapore that belongs to the people who belong on this island and who are the rightful owners of Singapore, and have elected politicians to represent our rights, and not to allow power to get into their heads so much so that they think that they know everything that is right for us including the curtailing of the very rights that we use to put them in their place in the first place.

D) Now, the final question is – is the win for the Punggol East by-election on a local level representative of what the larger group of Singaporeans want on a national level? The answer? It is.

The 43.71% that PAP collected at the Punggol East by-election is 10.83% lower than the 54.54% showing at the General Election 2011. The 54.52% that WP had won is 13.5% higher than their precious win of 41.01%. This a switch in fortune.

If you’ve looked at a previous article that I’ve written, you will see (in Chart 1) that if PAP had continued on their downward trajectory from General Election 2011 to 2016, they could possibly lose by another 10 percentage points and WP would have increase their winning margin by another 10 percentage points, which means that at General Election 2016, PAP might win around 50% of the votes and WP might win 55%, on average, of the seats they would contest in. This means that in General Election 2016, PAP can potentially lose all the seats that WP would contest in. Still, WP had only contested in 24 seats in 2011 and even if they would win all their seats, they would only form barely a quarter of parliament, hardly the one-third they need to represent Singaporeans to be able to use their voting power as a credible check on the government. So, this is a question that Singaporeans would need to ask ourselves – what can we do to help ourselves and to ensure fair representation?

Slide24

;

Chart 1

Anyway, back to the Punggol East by-election, the 10% swing away from PAP and the 10% swing towards WP which should happen in General Election 2016 was actually brought forward to the Punggol East By-Election 2013 – there was a 10.83% swing away from PAP and 13.5% swing towards WP. Does this mean the tide has changed faster than anticipated? Well, it could be. But two factors will let us have more clarity. First, the residents of Punggol East are considered younger and middle class. What this means is that they are more likely than the rest of the population to be more Internet savvy and be less conservative in their voting behaviour. Their voting behaviour would thus be more aggressively liberal, if you could put it that way. Second, this is a by-election. And as explained before, when voting for the by-election, there is lesser, or actually, not a need for consideration on how one’s vote would impact on the national level, because it is only one constituency that is voting, thus voters can vote as true to what they believe in as they can.

So, assuming that on these two counts, voters are willing to vote more liberally and genuinely you can assume that if this was a General Election, their voting behaviour might be slightly more conservative, which would mean that they might vote at 50% (or so?) their exact intention? Thus instead of a swing of 10.83% away from PAP, there might be only a 5.42% swing away, and instead of a 13.5% swing towards WP, there might be only a 6.75% swing towards WP. If you extrapolate that we’ve already passed 2 years since the last general election and would have another 3 years towards the next general election, the swing away from PAP, taking into account the overall population and that the population will also vote more ‘safely’, you would get about a 10% swing away from the PAP and 10% swing towards the WP at the next general election in 2016, so it’s about there – it’s representative.

E) So, What’s Next?

Will that happen? We have three more years to find out. Within these three years, what will PAP do to contain the fallout and to preserve their dominance? You can bet on it that they will definitely do something. Question is, will we know when they do it? And will we speak up and challenge them on it? If you are expecting WP to have a stronger showing for the next three years, don’t count on it. I say this not because you shouldn’t have expectations on WP. If you truly want to know how WP will perform, you cannot rely on mainstream media because coverage of them will be minimal and if you so believe what the mainstream media chooses to tell you, then you will buy into the belief that WP had and will do do nothing. But if you look into the parliamentary proceedings, you will realise that the 8 WP MPs and NMPs (and now 9) would have raised more questions than the 81 (and now 80) PAP MPs have raised, as some commenters have pointed out. Also, you would need to be a resident in the WP constituencies to have an accurate understanding of how well they are managing their constituencies. The voters have consistently voted for Mr Low Thia Kiang ever since he was first elected, more than 20 years ago. That should say something. And if one thinks that just because the voters of Punggol East are younger and that the older voters will not vote for WP, the uncles and aunties who attend WP’s rallies and await the results of WP at the coffee shops would have you know that’s not true – the older generation is rooting for WP as well.

So, what will PAP do next? If PAP does rig the system and they are caught out and you can be sure that the probers would dig out at least half of what they plan to do, this would be very embarrassing for PAP and would cause more Singaporeans to become disillusioned by PAP, which will affect their vote share. Question is, what other tricks does PAP have up their sleeves.

As stated in a previous article, there is always about 35% of voters who are clear supporters of PAP. In this by-election, 43.71% voted for PAP, which means that about 8% to 9% of the voters still have some hope that PAP can do the right thing, and have stuck by PAP. However, about 10% have swung the other away. So, the swing voters are currently split 50-50. Question is, what will PAP do which if they get caught out, would cause more swing voters to cross over?

The best thing that PAP can do now is to be honest with themselves, and with Singaporeans, and to be responsive to not only just what their supporters believe in, but what ALL Singaporeans believe in, and then recalibrate to a middle ground which will be more fair and equal. At the same time, the PAP will need to recognise that Singaporeans no longer believe in just having their material needs fulfilled. All the carrots that PAP had dangled prior to the by-election would show PAP that Singaporeans no longer buy into material justifications for PAP’s rule. Singaporeans want to be treated fairly and justly, and as individuals, as human beings, not as workers. We want our rights returned, we want an egalitarian society and we want a healthy dose of respectable time for ourselves. Now, PAP knows this. And of course, PAP would know everything else that is said in this article. Question is, will they do anything about it? Singaporeans feel that the two years that they’ve given PAP since the last general election has yielded nothing and they’ve sent a very strong message to PAP. So, will they finally budge?

If you look at the previous article, PAP is at the beginning of another decade of upward growth in their vote share (Chart 2), which means this is about time they start putting in the right policies and programmes to benefit the people, to bring their votes onto the upswing. But question is, will this happen? And also, considering that they’ve suffered their greatest fall ever, over the past decade, how many Singaporeans are willing to forgive them and how much more would they need to do to ensure that their votes go on the upswing, if it does so?

Slide6

;

Chart 2

The story has always been that Singaporeans are a docile bunch who want stability. So surely, they would be patient with the PAP. And PAP has three years to make it right. Let’s see how fast they react. And as far as the opposition goes, WP is also cognizant that Singaporeans want stability. For now, they want to act as the gatekeeper for Singaporeans. They understand equally what else could be at stake for Singapore. But for PAP, they need to also be cognizant that throughout history, when there’s a growing ruling class which prides itself too heavily and continuously slights the people’s wishes and creates an ever growing working class population who become disfranchised, then revolution will come, whether PAP likes it or not. It’s written all over history. So, this is a game that PAP had played themselves into and now they have to find a way to get out of the hole that they’ve dug themselves into. But Singaporeans are a forgiving bunch. So, let’s wait and see how this will pan out.

F) Before I end, I would like to point out two things that this by-election has shown us:

1) Some of the success for WP’s by-election can also be attributed to a tightly-knitted online strategy ran by disparate groups of online voices, which somehow managed to get their voice heard and across. There wasn’t a strategy but somehow we managed to get ourselves heard. How can we take that into the next level? How can we have a stronger and more strategic understanding of the political ongoings to be consistent in our messages? Is it just because voters were tactical, which prevented the loss of votes to be diluted by RP and SDA (not that it would have mattered anyway, thankfully!) or was there a more strategic understanding that both voters and online commenters have towards the strategic importance of their votes? This is something we need to think about, to strengthen ourselves, and also something the PAP needs to and will surely think about before the next general election.

2) By now, it would be very clear that PAP and WP are the two bigwigs to be reckoned with, in the political scene in Singapore. From RP and SDA’s showing, they would need to go back to do some homework. The key lies in strategy and convincing Singaporeans that you have one. The other parties to look out for would be SDP and NSP – both were in the top four best performing opposition parties in General Election 2011. SDA has a growing following. Whether their strategic maneuver to join in and then withdraw from the by-election just before Nomination Day, and how it would be felt and responded to by Singaporeans depends, and is to be seen. But I do not think their core supporters would think otherwise – they will continue to throw their support behind SDP, especially when SDP has some credible politicians in their midst and have put up some credible policy recommendations. Now, NSP had remained seemingly quiet. But do not underestimate the media statements that they have been putting out over the course of the by-election. They have shown themselves to be respectable and gentlemanly in their approach, and for Singaporeans who desire stability and clean politics, there’s much to desire with NSP’s subtle but quietly powerful approach.

*****

So, there you go. How will things pan out. It’s all going to be very exciting for Singapore in the next 3 years and beyond. But if PAP learns to truly listen to Singaporeans and Singaporeans learn to take responsibility over their own rights, we shouldn’t veer too far off the track that we are already on and we should continue to prosper as a nation. And importantly, we will need to ensure that we have multiple checks and balances in the political system. For now, we should aim to put in enough opposition members in parliament to be a credible check (and demand that they cooperate with one another). Next, with credible checks within parliament, we would then need to aim for the independence of the estates of governance – the president, economy, judiciary and military – to be independent of one another so that they are also able to act as credible checks to protect Singaporeans from a monopoly of power. Singaporeans, as the core citizenry, should also one day aim to identify and define ourselves as one of the estates of governance.

Advertisements

20 comments

  1. Anthony Sim

    Well done on the analysis. It is necessary to understand the means to this spectacular end.
    Singapore politics is coming of age.

    As long as communication network is free flowing and people are willingly to voice their opinions, there will certainly be progress and changes.

    So lets have Singaporeans, participate more by providing their valuable input or comments and keep this blog a dynamic medium for discussion on any relevant issues that will shape the the future of the country.

    Well done Roy, perhaps you can take time off and soaked yourself with this victory.

  2. popotan

    Always enjoyed reading your blog. Thank you.

    BTW it is ‘soundly thumped PAP’s Koh Poh Koon’, not ‘thumbed’.

    The PAP needs to wake the hell up and rethink its policies and the direction which it is taking this country towards. Otherwise, it will lose more ground in GE2016.

    A lack of political competition through the decades has made the PAP complacent, arrogant and quite out-of-touch. Consequently, the people who joined its ranks are:

    1) Scholar-technocrats who do not know how to run a country.
    2) Greedy folks who see PAP membership as a fast ticket to prestige and wealth.
    3) Flatterers and connected cronies of the establishment. Case in point: Wong Kan Seng, the son-in-law of LKY.
    4) General idiots.

    The PAP needs to have an honest, hard look at itself in the mirror and do some political spring cleaning (and it’s not just for CNY!)

    The result and its various statistics are an astounding embarrassment to the PAP, no doubt about it. However, what it definitely shouldn’t do now is to point fingers and find scapegoats. Ego-driven blame pushing will achieve nothing, and eventually will bounce back to hurt it.

    • My Right to Love

      Dear popotan,

      Thanks for pointing that out! I will make the amendment!

      And it’s true – PAP needs to reflect on itself honestly. The worry is that they might only further recluse themselves, and if so, GE 2016 will be very interesting.

      Either they will put up more barriers to prevent access by the other parties or Singaporeans will vote even more strongly with their hearts.

      Roy

  3. Tan Kok Tim

    Half-time 2-0. Will the PAP come up with counter-measures from losing two battles not to lose the war? What will be the effective measures not to let the rising tide become a deluge?

    Is the PAP Govt listening and listening well? If not, what is holding them back?

    I repeatedly post over the months: I hope the present Cabinet will embrace the social values of the founding of the PAP and the original mission statement of the HDB to be guided by it to stay relevant in governing, and able to govern effectively and efficiently.

    It is better to lose some of the battles than lose the war.

    But will the Govt truly listen or have the nagging concern of : letting lose the bird will fly or holding it too tight, the bird will die?

    Are there any valid phobia or dilemma, or paranoid concerns?

    =====

    After the dust of the PE BE has settled, quietened down, and all return to business as normal, Singaporeans will watch on 25th Feb for the 2013 Budget and what will be in it for them. Is the Govt ready to be decisive?

    In this year’s Budget, I hope the Govt will listen again. I hope the Govt will set up:

    the Transport Rebate Fund;
    the Counter Inflation Fund;
    the WorkFare Income Supplement Fund; and
    the Payroll Fund.

    When GST rate is raised in the next few years, the funds should be for the setting up of a Medical Assistance Fund. This is possible when the GST rate is raised from 7 to 10% gradually as the 3% will generate some $4bn for setting up this fund possible.

    I wrote a few pieces on the above. Those interested might wish to check it out.

    Please google tankoktim @ blog.com under Government or Govt’s Budget categories.

    The Govt did listen. Once in 2011 when the Govt implemented the S$1bn Community Silver Trust in the 2011 Budget. How many MPs and would-be politicians know what this Trust is for? I wrote this in my blog.com in 2011: “My letter to the media & Govt on the new S$1b Community Silver Trust”.

    The Govt listened again, and that was last year. The Govt set up the GST Voucher Fund in the 2012 Budget. I wrote a piece in my blog.com as GST is an issue I follow closely. I wrote: “Have a separate ‘GST-Rebate Fund’?” I hope the Govt will listen again in this year’s Budget.

    LTA has announced $700m to build covered walkways, etc. to all the MRT stations. Not a small amount to provide all these facilities.

    If the Govt listens again to present the 2013 Budget, I hope the Govt will set aside $700m for the 4 funds below as initial seed money:

    1] the Transport Rebate Fund;.

    2]the Counter Inflation Fund;.

    3]the WorkFare Income Supplement Fund; and.

    4]the Payroll Fund.

    [More on what I wrote on the PE BE, those interested, please google tankoktim.blog.com under Politics category.

  4. Anon23

    Bro,

    You forgot to include effect of immigrants and their rapid (or is it rabid !) citizenship conversions as part of your analyses. PAP may have lost the Punggol battle but the war for 2016 would be fought on PAP set rules in the coming days (super GRC, increased deposit, pork and barrel politicking etc.).

    My biggest fear is, there may not be any change and PAP would still continue to import by plane-loads and ICA would issue red toilet papers/pink wipes without any regards. I’ve been searching overseas job boards and I puke each time, when I see Contact Singapore name appears across all openings (from cleaner’s to PMET’s)……..

    Singapore civil servants lack any fighting skills against their political master’s to push the policies back to where it belongs !! Unlike your conclusion, PAP has become a cancer to the Singapore at-large and it could be solved only by utter defeat (not by incremental changes in 2016 or 2021). Till today, there is NO noise from PAP on any other $2 companies contracting with Singapore critical infrastructure services and it clearly shows certain other voodoo acts behind their highfalutin sense of integrity to compromise Singapore, irrespective of costs.

    insh……………………….

    PS: At tail end of WWII, Allied forces could not find a single Nazi card carrying member in Germany !!

  5. Ian Lim

    I believe that WP is still not ready to take on the governance role, as of now. PAP’s way of driving Singapore is similar to a top notch MNC’s directive, but maximizing profits through capitalism and WP’s role should be of somehow, a HR Director role, taking care of employees’ (Singaporean) welfare and benefits. I believe this should work fairly well in a 2 party system, with due respect to the other oppo party. Somewhat or rather, you really need someone experience in driving Singapore in a globalisation environment and some one else to keep everything in tab on a national level, which WP can be of a gatekeeper in making sure that Singaporean will not be short-changed.

  6. Jentrified Citizen

    Reblogged this on Jentrified Citizen and commented:
    JC- This is an excellent and incisive commentary by The Heart Truths blogger. We have all been asking PAP to listen hard to the people till we are sounding like a broken record playing on a loop. But we have no choice but to keep this up until we see real and honest changes being made that truly benefit Singaporeans.

  7. SM Goh

    Let’s try and not get ahead of ourselves here. As LTK mentioned in today’s papers, WP is not ready to form a government or provide ministers, and I think Sylvia Lim mentioned in the press conference on Saturday that WP has “some ways to go to form a 1/3 majority”. The last thing we want to do here is spook voters that PAP will be replaced as the government, which will no doubt swing voters back to them, which is exactly what your article does.

    PE was a gratifying win nonetheless, but slow and steady wins the race.

  8. Pingback: Punggol East By-Election Result | The Singapore Daily
  9. CBLLCB

    Incisive and frank. On your point that PAP cannot become like China and North Korea. Well, they can. This will largely depend on how the global dominance between the western democracies (led by the USA) and China pan out in this century. That is why the urgency to have at least (1/3MPs + 1) in the opposition camp in parliament. The PAP can and will change the constitution when the global balance of power shift. Although we cannot effect change in the global arena, but we Singaporeans MUST retain power in our hands.

    i do not wish to see the demise of the PAP provided they still have a heart for the people. Seems to me the PAP care more for Singapore than Singaporeans! The PAP gives me the impression that they can just dump the whole lot of Sinkies into the South China Sea and easily import people from China and India to replace us!!! That is why i am angry with them!

    A 2 party system? i dare to imagine a multi-party system in our SG parliament! Singapore is so open to global influence, we need more than a centre left and a centre right parties, we can and we must accommodate a stronger ballast in the forms of weaker smaller opposition parties. My dream team parliament will consist of a (2/3MPs -1)PAP and the rest an opposition coalition. The case you bring up about the NSP i concur with. Do not underestimate the NSP (i am not a member of any political party). I see the NSP as a still small but salient ballast that will anchor Singapore as it is being toss and turn in this perfect storm of the 21st century of a rising not so benign dragon and multitudes of small voices defending democracy and freedom of individuals. NSP represent in me the confluence of the EAST and WEST – the Paranakan and the Eurasian – of Chinese and Malay parentage, of Asian and European ancestry. In times of tumoil in the not so distant future, when PAP clamour for GDP growth by bantering to global power and the WP with their Chinese heartland electorate to appease and the SDP’s staunch defence of the democratic ideals, i hope to see a still small voice in the form of the NSP, reminding us that we are Singapore, a confluence of the East and West, and we can co-exist peacfully – as ONE Singapore.

  10. Sunny

    In the aftermath of PE BE LHL has said at the Singapore perspectives forum that the
    internet forum by singaporeans will have to be “moderated”,a further “tweaking”
    of the freedoms of bloggers.Also lamely admitting it lack “foresight” in the ramping up of population of logistics like transport,housing,medical,JOBs etc.Bloggers need to be on your toes from now on.Expect a response from PA to try to pscho simgaporeans again.I hope Singaporeans know what is at stake.Think people,think critically don’t just blindly accept what any ruling party dioshes out for your consumption.

  11. Pingback: The East (2013) | copyfxtrade.com
  12. Anonymous

    make tailored on-site schooling towards the different departmental ranges inside your institution, There’s no particular thorough foundation and report on specialists, displays along with chit chat and quickly links for you to on-line neighbourhood- pals, it|What’s more , And so obviously people are not likely to own any type of frustration receiving the very best {The amazon marketplace|Amazon online|Ebay|Amazon .
    󥦥ȥå ޥե` http://tukelkozloweyecenter.com/images/viviennewestwood-m-28.html

  13. Lacy

    It is less expensive but the appeal in the kitchen is great because of its natural shine.
    Certainly, this does not signify that you should go out and buy the cheapest cookware collection that you
    can get. * Practice simple recipes at first to get used to the difference in heat.

  14. pattini salomon

    Two. A new level of privacy: If you invest your health prankish wih individuals go to night clubs, cafes or functions. Paying a minumum of one nighttime weekly for your occasion, you can use them, when you avoid night clubs, cafes as well as functions to sit down watching movie, a classy bath tub regarding rose oil, or perhaps the love of your own young man good friend or girlfriend.
    pattini salomon http://www.trailonfoot.com/acquista-online-scarpe-uomo-salomon-vendita/presa-salomon-speedcross-3-cs-nuovo-arrivo.html

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s