Singaporeans Earn The LOWEST Wages Among The High-Income Countries

Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Finance Tharman Shanmugaratnam had said at the NTUC Ordinary Delegates’ Conference on Tuesday 29 October 2013, that, “What (Singapore has) achieved is not normal. It is not normal amongst countries that are in the same league as us. And it means, first of all, that we must be doing some things right. We can’t be doing everything wrong, because we would not be in this very unusual situation of having low unemployment and significant income growth, a better situation than these other economies.”

For the countries that DPM Tharman had pointed out as being in the “same league” as us, he had singled out US, UK, Germany and Japan, and the Asian NIEs (Chart 1).

20131031_234826-1

Chart 1: The Straits Times

Mr Tharman had said that in the US, “the median household has seen a decline in their real incomes” and in Germany, “the average household has seen very little income growth”. He also said that Hong Kong has “achieved some income growth for the average household, about 6% in real terms in the last five years” but for Singapore, “for the median household, we have achieved significant real income growth in the last five years, about 18%.”

He also added that, “Over the last 20 years, lower income households in Singapore, households that are at the bottom 20 per cent, have seen their incomes improve by 60 per cent in real terms.”

If you were taken aback by the statistics that Mr Tharman had shown, you wouldn’t be the only one.

Because if you look at the chart below, you would see that for the lowest income households, they have actually seen their real incomes drop (Chart 2). So, where did the “60% growth in real terms” for the low income households come from?

Uneven Real Income Growth

Chart 2: The Straits Times

Not only that, if we turn our attention to look at the real median income of individual Singapore residents, you can also see that it has hardly grown for the poorest 20% since 1996 (Chart 3).

Real median monthly income of resident employed, 1996 to 2009

Chart 3: The Straits Times

In fact, I had then compared Singapore with countries in the “same league” – the other high-income countries, and I found that Singaporeans actually earn the lowest median wage (Chart 4).

Slide1

Chart 4: International Labour Organisation Data collection on wages and income

We also earn the lowest pay in manufacturing, as compared to the other high-income countries (Chart 5).

photo 1 (5)

Chart 5: Global Wage Report 2012/13

Other statistics also point to the same thing – Singaporeans earn the lowest average salaries among high-income countries (Chart 6).

Slide3

Chart 6: BBC Global migrants: Which are the most wanted professions?

UBS also says that we have the lowest wage levels among the developed countries (Chart 7).

Slide4

Chart 7: UBS Prices and Earnings 2011

And if you look at the growth in our median wages over the years, you can see that our median wages (red line) continue to remain the lowest among all the high-income countries (Chart 8).

Slide5

Chart 8: International Labour Organisation Data collection on wages and income

Now, don’t get me wrong. Is Mr Tharman justified to say that real incomes have grown in Singapore? Well, he is. Mr Tharman had quoted the growth in real median household income from 2007.

So, let’s take a look at the change of personal incomes from 2007. From 2007, you can see that indeed, Singapore has one of the highest change in median incomes in some years (2008 and 2011) (Chart 9).

Slide6

Chart 9: International Labour Organisation Data collection on wages and income

But perhaps there is a reason why he doesn’t show the statistics for before 2007. Because if you look at Chart 9, from 2003 to 2006, we actually have one of the lowest change in median incomes (Chart 10).

Slide7

Chart 10: International Labour Organisation Data collection on wages and income

But the issue isn’t in so much as in whether our growth in median wages is the highest – not at this point anyway, because as you can see from the charts above, we have the lowest wages anyway, so even if we have the highest proportionate change in income, the nominal change would not be as significant.

Imagine this, if you have 20 oranges and you increase the number of oranges you have by 20%, you will get another 4 oranges. But imagine another person who has more oranges to start off with, say 50 oranges,and if he increases the number of oranges he has just by 12%, he would get another 6 oranges – 2 more than the 4 you would have. But the proportionate increase is only 12%, as compared to the more dramatic 20% that you have. This is the kind of situation that Singapore is at now, as compared to the other countries.

Indeed, if you look at Chart 11, if you compare the wage growth in monetary terms, from 2007 to 2010, the monetary wage growth is average, when compared to the other high-income countries.

Slide8

Chart 11: International Labour Organisation Data collection on wages and income

In fact, between 2008 and 2009, the wage growth in monetary terms is the lowest in Singapore (with the exception of Japan) (Chart 12).

Slide9

Chart 12: International Labour Organisation Data collection on wages and income

Also, the question isn’t whether we have the highest income growth, but whether this growth will keep up. If growth continues based on the 2007-2011 growth rate of 6%, by 2020, we should reach an income level of that of the United States or Canada (Chart 13).

Slide10

Chart 13

But if growth falls back to the levels of 2003-2006, of 1%, we will still continue to earn the lowest incomes among the high-income countries (Chart 14).

Slide11

Chart 14

But let’s put some things into perspective.

Do you know that Singapore has one of the highest prices in the world (Chart 15 – note that this chart only shows the high-income countries).

Slide12

Chart 15: UBS Prices and Earnings 2011

However, when compared to our wages, there is a huge disparity (calculated as the difference between the price and wage levels) in what we are paid as compared to what is necessary for us to use. You can see in Chart 14 that Singaporeans are paid the least adequately in our wages as compared to what is necessary for us to have a commensurate standard of living (Chart 16).

Slide13

Chart 16: UBS Prices and Earnings 2011

In fact, we should actually be paid wages that are similar to the standards of Australia and Finland – countries with similar price levels as Singapore.

Thus you can see that in order for us to get there, our wages should be growing at 9% every year until 2020 (Chart 17).

Slide14

Chart 17

However, wages are only growing on average, at 6% between 2007 and 2011. It doesn’t seem likely that wages will increase by 9% anytime soon, and even so, what is the likelihood that wages will continue to grow at 6% for the next 10 years?

In fact, the Monetary Authority of Singapore had also just announced that resident wage growth is at 4.5% in the first half of 2013. Thus at this rate, it is likely that Singaporeans will continue to earn the lowest wages among the high-income countries.

But do you know what is the major discrepancy here? Singapore is actually the second richest country in the world, by GDP per capita (Chart 18). Add to that with one of the highest prices in the world, this means that we must have one of the highest income inequality in the world.

Slide15

Chart 18: CIA The World Factbook GDP – per Capita (PPP)

As UOB economist Francis Tan had said, the “more worrying is the fact that the wage growth is not even across all sectors (and this) may worsen income inequality.”

And he is right. From 2002, there is an increase in the income inequality in Singapore, and this is already after deducting for taxes and transfers back to the poor (Chart 19).

Slide17

Chart 19: Key Household Income Trends, 2012

And when compared to the other high-income countries, we also have the highest income inequality (Chart 20).

Slide16

Chart 20: OECD StatExtract Income Distribution and PovertyKey Household Income Trends, 2012

But perhaps the government is trying its darn best to reduce the income inequality, you say? Perhaps they are doing so, and that is why the growth of median incomes has increased over the past few years?

Sorry to burst your bubbles but that’s not likely. If you compare the income inequality of Singapore to the other countries since 2000, you can see that the income inequality in Singapore has remained consistently high, while that of the other countries have been consistently lower (Chart 21).

Slide18

Chart 21: OECD StatExtract Income Distribution and PovertyKey Household Income Trends, 2012

You see, the governments in the other countries put in a consistent effort to reduce the income inequality in their countries.

But why is our income inequality so bad, you might ask? One reason could be because in Singapore, the workers have the lowest wage share among the high-income countries (Chart 22). This also means that in Singapore, companies earn higher profits, and possibly the highest profits as compared to the other high-income countries – all these while the workers in Singapore earn the lowest wages.

Slide2

Chart 22: International Labour Office Global Wage Report 2008/09Ministry of Trade and Industry Economic Survey of Singapore First Quarter 2013

In fact, the low wage share (and high profits) is something that has plagued Singapore for more than two decades now (Chart 23).

Slide3

Chart 23: International Labour Office Global Wage Report 2008/09Ministry of Trade and Industry Economic Survey of Singapore First Quarter 2013

Perhaps the income inequality couldn’t be more apparent than if you look at the chart below from The Great Singapore Race (Chart 24). According to The Great Singapore Race, average monthly household income from work grew by only 18% for the poorest 10% from 2000 to 2012, while it grew by a staggering 95% for the richest 10% over the same period.

Screenshot (8)_edited

Chart 24: The Great Singapore Race

And in Chart 25, you can also see that the gap between the rich and poor have thus grown even further apart. In 2000, the richest 10% earned 12 times more than the poorest 10%. In 2012, the gap grew to be 19 times bigger.

Screenshot (9)_edited

Chart 25: The Great Singapore Race

So, you see, Mr Tharman is correct. What Singapore has “achieved is not normal”. Indeed, for a country that is the richest, if not one of the richest in the world, and for a country with one of the highest prices in the world, it is  very “not normal” for our incomes to be so low. It is also very “not normal” that as such a rich country and when compared to the other high-income countries in the “same league” as us, that the government is not able to do more for its people and reduce the income inequality in Singapore.

Singapore stands in stark contrast to the other countries in the “same league”, where the governments in these countries would share in the wealth of the nation, so that the poor in the country wouldn’t be left out. Singapore is indeed an anomaly and the only country among the other high-income countries where the government continues to take the wealth contributed by the people, without sharing it back. As such, the poorest in Singapore have only seen slight increases in their nominal wages, but when factoring for inflation, their real wages have actually dropped.

The government can try to come out with all sorts of ways to paint a nicer picture but the fact of the matter is that the lot of the poor has gotten worse and this is not something that the PAP can run away from, just by putting up another set of statistics that would tell the story that they want people to hear. Also, for Singaporeans who have to live with one of the highest prices in the world, we are being paid wages that cannot possibly allow a respectable standard of living for the most of us.

The matter of fact of the situation in Singapore is that prices have gone berserk in Singapore, as the government had for a few years tried to make as much money off the people as they could, so they had increased prices beyond levels that the people could comfortably afford. And now, where prices in Singapore has reached a peak, where the people can no longer properly consume with the wages they are given, we have reached a threshold, which might be difficult to contain down the road.

Unfortunately, do we see an end in sight to this mess that has been created? It is unlikely that the PAP would be able to take any drastic measures to correct the issues that plague our country, as doing so would cause them to sacrifice their own economic and business interests, which have been deeply entrenched into the system. A viable solution would be a major shakeup in our system that allows the government to properly function in its role as an oversight of the economy, rather than a key business player within the system. Only when the government can play a non-intrusive role would it have more autonomy to decide on key policy measures that would enable the rights of  the citizens and the workers here to be adequately protected.

The choice is clear, if we want a country where our people would be treated and respected as equally as possible.

Slide1

25 comments

  1. Vote for the future of Singapore please!

    LKY ever since he started running Singapore has made Singapore a conglomerate company, that is making it a company that makes money so that he can pay his ministers and himself world class salaries. So what about Singaporeans? Well, he wants us to be workers not entrepreneurs. Because workers just make enough to survive, work very hard for the Country so that these “masters” continue to get the most money and also the “co-masters” (rich tycoons or businessmen who have “common interests” with these “masters” and poor workers of most Singaporeans just get little. He doesn’t want Singaporeans to be entrepreneurs or businessmen because once you made the money, you can start to influence the politics just like the United States. And other reason is because workers have to work their butt out to survive, pay bills, pay COE, buy overly expensive HDB or private housing etc (but most can only afford one), they have no time to think or get involved in politics. All these strategies are already being well prepared by LKY long time ago.

    So fellow Singaporeans, most of us look good on the outside but really we are just workers or “slaves” to the elite PAP government, I called ourselves as “high class” workers just like Air hostesses are like “high class” waitresses. We looked good because we have a house (which we will take a lifetime to own it) probably a car (for some) and maybe once a year travelling (for some) BUT we have little savings (most of the CPF are being used for housing) and when we stopped working either retrenched, fired or too old to work, sorry man, all your burdens like HDB loans, car loans etc will all come down on you, and the government will not care anything about you. Those subsidies or help for the poor are so hard to get that you won’t get any, you will probably be forced to sell everything you have and use it to spend for the rest of your life.

    If the mentality of this ruling party is make Singapore government rich at the cost of depressing Singaporeans pay especially with the influx of foreigners (be it FT or FW), then no wonder all these statistics above showed us what we are today and probably the same for us in the future, seeing a huge income or wealth gap between us as the workers and the elite group (like LKY and its ministers and its GLC members and of course some of his gang of tycoon friends like Ng Teng Fong etc).

    Sad but this is what Singaporeans chose to have since day 1 they started voting!

    So lets do something about the next GE, lets get another party in to co-run Singapore just like in the US.

  2. Vote for the future of Singapore please!

    One more point, what Tharman showed to us on median income growth of 17.7% is the result of all family income which includes again the elite group that I have mentioned, they own most of the income and wealth in Singapore so that increase is actually their increase not the ordinary Singapore which I classified as “workers” whether you are blue or white collar, its the same. so for most of these workers, absolute numbers like 80% of Singaporeans but only owned maybe 20-30% of wealth/income in Singapore, the increase is not that high.

  3. Nick

    I fully agree with you. Tarman cannot be trusted. These ministers always try to nit-pick data to paint a rosy picture so that they can give themselves a pat on the back and more GDP bonus for themselves. For uneployment rate, they pick 2013 data, for the median income growth rate, they pick the year up to 2012. Very good. F the ST. Obi good that it got hacked. I hope the reporter pee in her pants for her deliberate twisting of words.

  4. Pingback: Singaporeans Are Poor Because The PAP Makes Us Poor | The Heart Truths
  5. Pingback: Singaporeans Pay The Most Expensive University Tuition Fees In The High-Income Countries | The Heart Truths
  6. Pingback: Why Are Singaporean PMETs Losing Their Jobs? Here’s Why. | The Heart Truths
  7. Pingback: The Real Reasons Why Singaporean PMETs Are Losing Their Jobs | The Heart Truths
  8. interesting

    It is interesting that you described Singapore’s median wage growth as “average” when it is the 5th largest among developed countries, but described the price level in Singapore as “one of the highest” when it is only the 9th among the developed countries.

  9. Pingback: Singapore Has The Biggest Wage Gap Between The Educational Levels Among The Rich Countries | The Heart Truths
  10. Pingback: Riots and Wages in Singapore: Part 2 | The Heart Truths
  11. sheikh

    singapore ministers salary one of the best in the world.!!!!!!
    you forget about this statistic and chart.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  12. Pingback: Singapore’s Tax System: Robbing The Poor To Feed The Rich | The Heart Truths
  13. Pingback: Essay Outline 1 | russ1337
  14. Pingback: Increasing S&CC: The Government Making Singaporeans Pay More To Earn From Us | The Heart Truths
  15. Pingback: Budget 2014: PAP Still Spends Too Little On Health For Singaporeans | The Heart Truths
  16. Pingback: No, Lee Hsien Loong, You Be Kinder. | The Heart Truths
  17. Pingback: Singapore’s Crony Capitalism A Recipe For Disaster | The Heart Truths
  18. nairbv

    3k pre-tax income in Singapore is far more than 4k pre-tax income in the US, since taxes are much higher in the US.

  19. Pingback: Singapore’s Crony Capitalism A Recipe For Disaster | Exploring the World
  20. Pingback: Long Read: Income Inequality in Singapore | merlion muse
  21. Pingback: Singapore’s Economic Growth and Social Development Story (My Article for Oxford Round Table Journal) | The Heart Truths
  22. Pingback: Wages: How PAP has Betrayed Singaporeans | The Heart Truths
  23. ashvin thambyah

    This article has conveniently left out the fact that in the countries the author is comparing Singapore to, the income taxes are way higher. I would argue that the take home pay of folk in these countries are smaller than of those in Singapore.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s