The Truth: GIC Manages Only Singaporeans’ CPF and You Should Earn 6% On Your CPF?

Since the 1980s, PAP has taken our CPF to invest in GIC. However, for the past 15 years, they kept denying this. Lee Kuan Yew denied this in 2001 and 2006 and Ng Eng Hen denied this in 2007.

Finally, on 30 May 2014 this year, PAP finally admitted for the first time that they take our CPF to give GIC to use. The Ministry of Finance admitted, “The Government’s assets (which our CPF is part of) are therefore mainly managed by GIC.

But why did PAP want to hide this from Singaporeans? Why did PAP not want to admit to the truth?

Today, we know that Singaporeans have paid $260 billion into the CPF. But how much is the GIC managing?

PAP claims that “the size of the Government’s funds managed by GIC … are not published … (because) It is not in our national interest to publish the full size of our reserves.

But “What has been revealed is that GIC manages well over US$100 billion.”

So, why does PAP not want to let Singaporeans know how much GIC manages, and how much exactly does GIC manages?

GIC has S$236 billion in 2007

In 2008, GIC lost S$59 billion.

According to Lee Kuan Yew, this meant that GIC “lost about 25 per cent of its value from its peak last year“.

Thus if you work backwards, what this means is that in the Financial Year 2007, GIC would have managed S$236 billion.

So, it looks like we might have the closest estimate to how much GIC straight from the horse’s mouth – S$236 billion in 2007.

Singaporeans’ CPF Makes Up 65% of the Assets GIC Manages?

In 2007, Singaporeans paid S$137 billion into the CPF.

Does this mean that of the assets that GIC managed, our CPF accounted for 58% of the assets?

Today, it is estimated that GIC has grown to S$400 billion. Today, Singaporeans have paid S$260 billion into the CPF. This would make up 65% of the GIC’s estimated value.

Does this mean that GIC is managing even more of our CPF today?

And note – 65% is a substantial amount. It means that two-thirds of the assets managed by the GIC are our CPF, or the declared official value of our CPF!

Slide1

100% of the Assets GIC Manages are Singaporeans’ CPF, When Including Interest Not Returned?

Now, Singaporeans are paid 2.5% to 4% in interest on our CPF. This is an average of about 3%.

GIC is estimated to earn an interest of 6% since its inception in 1981, or 3% more than what we get on our CPF.

As I have written before, the 3% of interest that is not returned to Singaporeans would mean that Singaporeans are losing about half of our CPF to the PAP.

As such, even though there is the official value of $260 billion inside the CPF today, our CPF could actually have grown to twice the size, or $520 billion, if all the interest earned on our CPF was returned to our CPF.

This would mean that our CPF could actually be larger than the $400 billion value of the GIC!

In other words, our CPF does not account for only 65% of the assets that GIC manages. For the rest of the 35%, this could possibly be interest earned on our CPF that is not returned to Singaporeans. Some economists have explained that the interest not returned to Singaporeans is an implicit tax that PAP is making Singaporeans pay to them.

In short, this would mean that all the assets that GIC is managing could actually be only our CPF and nothing else.

Slide2

Is this the reason why PAP does not want to let us know the value of GIC? So that we do not know the actual value that our CPF should have, and how much of the interest earned on our money (at least $140 billion) is not being returned to Singaporeans?

If GIC Only Manages Singaporeans’ CPF, Then Singaporeans Should Be Earning 6% on Our CPF

In 1981, when GIC was set up, Goh Keng Swee said, “there should be two pools of reserves – one to be managed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), the other to be managed by a new investment management organisation with a long-term orientation. The former needed to concentrate on holdings of liquid assets with short maturities to allow MAS to respond quickly to market conditions and switch large amounts between currencies, especially in an environment of increasingly volatile interest and exchange rates. The latter, however, could focus more on investments that would yield good long-term returns, such as equities.

Now, it is known than our reserves are made up “Sustained balance of payments surpluses and accumulated national savings (which) are the fundamental sources of the Singapore’s Government’s funds.” This was before GIC deleted this information from their website.

FAQs (1)

As the MAS manages “liquid assets” which would need to “allow MAS to respond quickly to market conditions”, it can be assumed that MAS manages the surpluses. And GIC, because it “could focus more on investments … (for the) long-term”, it would be managing our CPF, since as Professor Mukul Asher had said, CPF “is essentially a 35-year or more (the duration of one’s work-life) savings plan“.

Thus we can safely assume that MAS manages only the surpluses and GIC manages only our CPF.

Now, the government also said the reserves include “Singapore Government Securities (SGS) … (and) Special Singapore Government Securities (SSGS), which are Government bonds issued to the CPF Board.

Thus we can also assume that MAS manages the SGS and GIC manages the SSGS (since this is the CPF).

Slide3

And now, if you look at the breakdown of the SGS (including the SSGS) when this information was still available in the past, our CPF makes up the bulk of the SGS, or about 70% to 85% of the SGS.

This means that the government’s reserves are mostly made up of our CPF.

Central Provident Fund in Singapore CPF invested in SGS

What does this all means? From this, we can clearly see that the whole of GIC would most probably be made up of only our CPF, of both the official size of the CPF and the undeclared returns. And if there are any additional undeclared returns that GIC is not managing, they most probably are being managed by MAS or siphoned off to Temasek Holdings.

Now, GIC earns an estimated 6% in interest. Temasek Holdings earn 16%. Our CPF currently earns an average of only 3%.

If GIC is managing our CPF, should’t our CPF be getting the 6% interest since the GIC would be managing nothing else but our CPF? Also, if some of our CPF would most probably be managed by Temasek Holdings, shouldn’t some of our CPF also earns the 16% that Temasek Holdings is earning now?

This would mean that our CPF should be earning between 6% to 16% in interest, instead of the 2.5% to 4% that we are getting now.

PAP Says It is Taking On the Risk for Singaporeans, But It is Singaporeans Who are Taking On the Risk for PAP and GIC

Now, PAP might claim that they pool Singaporeans’ CPF together to give it to GIC to manage, so that the government takes on the risk of GIC (Read here, here, here and here.)

And PAP says that because they take on the risk, they get to keep the higher 6% interest while Singaporeans should only have a lower 3% interest.

But from this article, you can see that GIC would most probably be made up fully of our CPF, when including for interest earned confiscated by PAP and not returned.

If so, if GIC is only managing our CPF, doesn’t that mean that the fact of the matter is that our CPF would be the one taking on the full risk of the GIC?

If so, doesn’t this mean that Singaporeans would actually be the ones taking on the risk of the GIC? Thus no matter what returns are made, shouldn’t all the returns earned by GIC be returned to Singaporeans?

Thus is it disingenous for the PAP to claim that they take on the risk of GIC and our CPF, when it is our CPF and Singaporeans who are the ones actually taking on the risk of GIC?

Why does PAP want to come in to pretend to be the middleman to “take on the risk”?

Singaporeans Lose Half of Our What We Could Have Earned on Our CPF to PAP

You see, when PAP makes themselves the middleman, PAP can claim to be managing our CPF and because they then make it sound so dangerous, they can then say that they will then take on the risk, give us low interest and they will be our saviour by doing so, but then whatever additional returns earned, they will keep.

Easy right? Here’s an example. Let’s say you invest $1,000 on your own at 6% every year. In 13 year’s time, you will be able to get back $2,000.

Then let’s say I come in, I tell you why don’t you give me your $1,000, and by the way, it is a very dangerous world outside, if you handle your own money, you will lose it. Let me take your money, let me take on the “risk”, let me invest it for you. But because I take on the risk, I will give you only 3%. Whatever else I earn, I keep. Then after 13 years, I earn 6% and $1,000. But I only give you back $500. I take your money and earn another $500.

Slide4

You see, you could have earned $1,000. But I make you scared and tell you all sorts of fearful stories, then I take your money and give you only $500, while I take $500 for myself. Not bad right, do nothing and get $500 for free?

Now, if Singaporeans cannot retire today, can you see why? Whatever you could have earned, PAP have already taken half away from you. Now, this is not yet even including how much they had purposely increased the prices of flats, so that they make you lose even more of your CPF to pay for housing loans. Now, do you see why Singaporeans cannot save enough inside our CPF? The PAP has never meant for you to save because they already have a plan to take your money away – half of it from CPF and more from HDB.

PAP Makes Themselves the Middleman to Earn From Singaporeans’ CPF

But not only that – then why create GIC? If you are going to just use all my CPF to earn my money, then why not just use the CPF Board to do it?

Now, same example as above, let’s say you want to invest your $1,000, you put it in Bank ABC and earn $1,000.

Then I say, why not I invest your money for you? But I won’t use Bank ABC. I will tell you, you put your $1,000 in Bank ABC, then I transfer it into Bank XYZ. Now, with Bank XYZ, even though the only money I am using is your money, I make it a private bank and tell you I cannot let you know what is happening inside. Then I tell you, by the way, at Bank XYZ, I also mixed up your $1,000 with other money. Actually there is no other money, or there might be just a little bit, maybe $10, $20 or $50, but your $1,000 is still the main source of money I have in Bank XYZ. But I tell you I mixed it up anyway. Then I tell you because your $1,000 is only one small component, I can give you back only $500 back. Meanwhile, I tell you I can earn another $500 because of all these other mixed-up money I have. Not because of your $1,000, ok? It’s all so dangerous and I took all the risk, so I could earn the $500 all because of the risk I took.

But actually, truth is, it is all from your money. It is all your money.

Slide5

You see what Bank XYZ was used for? So that you will not be able to know what is happening inside and I can take your money to do whatever I want with it, I make it such that I don’t have to tell you and you cannot do anything about it.

But can I use Bank ABC to do the same? If I use Bank ABC, then I would have to let you know how much you are earning and have to give you back 6%. In Bank XYZ, I only need to give you back 3% and I can keep the other 3%.

You see what they are doing here to your money?

Do You Think You Should Be Earning 6% on Your CPF and Should CPF Board Take Back Your CPF from GIC to Manage Transparently?

If what GIC is managing is fully your CPF monies and GIC is earning 6%, would you do you think you should still earn the 3% on your CPF or should you be earning the full 6% on your CPF?

And if your CPF is is being routed into GIC to be managed but it could be all your CPF anyway and done so secretly somemore, would you rather take it back to the CPF Board and get the CPF Board to manage it with full transparency and accountability?

Slide6

PAP is Using Singaporeans’ CPF as Very Cheap Money for Themselves

Now, do you know why PAP keeps being so resistant to let Singaporeans put our CPF in private pension fund plans? If they let you do so, where will they get your money to put in GIC? How will they be able to earn? In fact, there is already a “private pension fund” – it is the GIC, just that your money is not being returned.

Thus our CPF is very cheap money for the PAP.

In his analysis of Singapore’s CPF system, Dr. Richard Wong, Director of the Hong Kong Centre for Economic Research, had said that, “It was clear from the very outset that the CPF would make available to government a cheap source of credit for social and economic development.

The Straits Times also admitted to this in 1983 that, “The CPF  … provided a cheap source of finance for the government. The CPF purchases government stocks, and the government loans the money cheaply to the HDB.”

Newspaper Article - The dollars and sense of CPF

Yet, Ng Eng Hen would deny this in 2007 and said that, “if it was that cheap, we would have a line of suitors waiting for that money. There is none.”

Even Lee Hsien Loong also said in 2007, “Some people say…Government wants cheap money to go and make a profit. We do not have to make cheap money. This is not that kind of government.

PAP Does Not Want Singaporeans to Know the Truth About the GIC Because GIC Manages 100% Our CPF?

You see, what is the truth?

Why did PAP not want to let Singaporeans know how much assets GIC is managing. Why did PAP not want to let Singaporeans know it is our CPF they are giving GIC to use?

If Singaporeans knew that GIC would in all likelihood be managing only our CPF, and if we knew how much GIC is managing, then we will know that of the $260 billion we have inside our CPF, not all is being returned. And we would know how much GIC is swallowing up from Singaporeans – at least another $140 billion?

Then, we will know the real reason why Singaporeans cannot retire today and why we cannot save enough inside our CPF. There might be another $140 billion that is not returned~!

Then, we will know the complete truth to what PAP is really taking our money to do, what they do not want to return to us, how they took half of our money away and earn for themselves.

You know, it is really easy to be the PAP. How else can you take the people’s money, make it your own, make it private and tell them you didn’t take it? And when they find out, tell them that it’s for their own good and you are trying to take on the risk for them. It’s very easy, you know? Just scare the people a bit, make them scared, then make that a valid reason to take their money from them.

I don’t know any other get rich quick scheme other than this one that the PAP has devised. It’s devious, scheming, disingenuous and despicable. This is the people’s hard-earned money you are playing around with, for goodness sake!

And if Singaporeans cannot retire today, you do not tell them that they did not work hard enough when it was you who took their hard-earned money to take for yourselves and not returned! When people cannot save enough, your first duty and responsibility as a government is to give back to them the money and earnings you took from them, and not to tell them to work longer, so that you can take their money from them!

What kind of government is this to take your money and earn for themselves, then blame you for not doing more, then make you work even more, so that they can earn more from you? What kind of crooked-minded government is this that would perverse such hardship onto the people, for their own selfish greed and wants?

I have no kind words for the PAP. They have been doing this since the 1980s for 30 years now, and not telling Singaporeans for at least the past 15 years. These past 30 years of manipulating Singaporeans and subjecting Singaporeans to the PAP’s victimisation is disgusting, dishonourable and downright despicable.

The PAP has hijacked the Singapore government for their own purposes and hijacked Singaporeans’ CPF for their own wanton and selfish greed. They have also hijacked our labour in exchange for the money that they can earned from us.

This is outrageous and disgusting. The PAP is no longer my government. The PAP is no longer our government.

#IDoNotTrustPAP

Come down to the #ReturnOurCPF 4 protest on 27 September 2014 at 4pm at Hong Lim Park. You can join the Facebook event page here.

On 27 September 2014, join us at the Hong Lim Park at 4pm at the #ReturnOurCPF 4 protest. The PAP cannot take our CPF and money to use and come out with a cock-and-bull story about how they do not know how they are using our money. When Singaporeans are not able to retire today, when our wages are depressed and more and more Singaporeans are becoming unemployed and are unable to save, then the PAP has failed Singaporeans and has become a liability to our country.

Join us at the next protest as we speak up against the low retirement funds and wages, and the high cost of living in Singapore.

You can join the Facebook event page here.

Also, my first court case will be held on 18 September 2014, at 10.00am. It will be a full-day hearing.

#ReturnOurCPF 4 Poster 2 final

Return Our CPF 4 Poster 1b

Advertisements

36 comments

  1. AC Nelson

    Hey Roy, do you have any views on the Pioneer Generation Package? The PAP has been loudly broadcasting it, but the details so far has been vague. Is PGP a vote buying exercise? Whose money are they using? How do they allocate the budget? What do you think?

    • meifen

      Me think they ask Tony Tan open the piggy bank. Last time Nathan was also asked to rubber stamp 20 over times without going through parliament. Then they also have a separate set of accounting for IMF which includes money from land sales that was not included in parliament when doing budgeting. Like my own private savings which I keep in separate bank not let my husband know. Then when emergency come, magically got money. No one knows except me.

    • landragon123

      It is a Pioneer for the Professionals, Doctors and Dentists. My experiences with them, the Dentists was very bad. When my filing fall out in my front 2 teeth and went for an emerigency repair, the dentist told me She need to take an X-ray which I refuse and she ask me to leave although I am their regular patient for over 10 years. I went to a dentist nearby and it was fix without X-ray. Now I learn that those extra jobs there wanted to do is to rob the government in the name of Pioneer.

  2. Where Is The Money Coming From?

    @ AC Nelson
    I think hor. The money from the Pioneer Generation Package come from the generous pockets of all PAP citizens.
    PAP citizens and ministers donated their own money for the Pioneer Generation Package.

    PAP government would never be so thick skinned.
    Take money from Singapore Reserves belonging to all Singaporeans.
    Give it to Singaporeans.
    And expect Singaporeans to be grateful.

    • Jim

      Roy, your readers think that PAP (ministers) already take out the money from the reserves because of what you write in this and other posts. So you are saying there are misappropriation of CPF by the PAP if you remain quiet.

  3. PAP get out !

    look, PM daily got how much pay ?
    100 times cost than people !
    too greedy ! SO ?
    we want to change !
    we want a new PM
    we people will take over GIC & Temasek !
    we can make it !
    no president seat,
    no huge income for PM , instead ,
    offer elderly daily living cost until they die
    just let PAP out !!!
    the only direction for Singaporeans .

  4. Lease buyback and Degrees

    Singapore has come to a pathetic state where most of its citizens will have to sell part of their nest through home leases to feed themselves in their retirement years. This is similar to people selling their body parts to make ends meet. Even dying in Singapore is not dignified. Singaporeans have suffered much, yet they are silent lambs not uttering much as they are being led to the slaughter house. In the living years of most Singaporeans, they are cramped in tiny pigeon holes , called HDB, as they struggled to contribute to the economy and making ends meet. In their retirement years, they have to sell their home leases.

    A few years back, Singaporeans were encouraged to study much, correlating a higher degree with better jobs. But recently, they are told not to study so much, and a degree doesn’t necessitate a good job. Those who heed the earlier advice are now left stranded as the government keeps twisting on its promises and rules.

  5. PAP Zombie Government Apocalypse Is Upon Us

    10 years of PM Lee Hsien Loong government..
    Do you think we have a government of brain dead Millionaire zombies?
    Sleepwalking through parliament?
    Teo Chee Bye. What do you think?

  6. Javert

    My boss has a forced savings scheme where he takes 40% of employees’ wages and returns it with interest when they retire. So far, I know that he has collected $600,000. He has been doing it for 10 years, and claims that he invests it in his other holdings to provide the interest.

    I also know that my boss owns a carrot cake store, which has a net worth of 1 million dollars. This store has been around for 10 years and earns $40,000 a year. He also owns property, schools, labs, charities, security forces and banks. My boss has put initial capital to each and earns profits from some, loses money in others, but I won’t consider any of those in my calculations because I have severe tunnel vision. I will only discuss the carrot cake store.

    Since boss owes us $600,000, and the boss claims he invests our money in his holdings, we actually own the majority of his carrot cake store right? And since the store has operated for 10 years, we actually own the other $400,000 also, so we own the entire store!

    Why is our boss being a dirty greedy middleman and enjoying the income from the carrot cake store? We must go to Hong Lim Park and protest!

    #RETURN OUR CARROT CAKE STORE #YOLO #SWAG

    • Deaf Frog's Toothpick

      @ Javert

      u confuse yourself over public monies and private money, in an employer-employee relationship, the asset of the “boss” is private.

      for a government, all the monies and assets on the government’s balance sheet belongs to the citizens collectively, the government/political party is just an agent endorsed to managed the monies and assets every election.

      all the monies are in a public account, there is no private account here.

      a political party cannot own anything generated by tax revenues, national assets or profit from reserves, there is no equivalent of “boss” and indeed the citizens collectively own all the assets in Temasek and GIC and everything else.

      • Anti-Opp

        If Low Thia Khiang & Sylvia Lim don’t get kicked out of parliament; will it benefit you and your family?

      • Puzzled

        It certainly benefits me & my family to have Low Thia Khiang & Sylvia Lim in parliament.
        – I think Opposition parties are more pro Singaporean than PAP

      • Anti-Opp

        That must be why they kept awfully quiet and let Roy fight for our CPF !
        Pro-Singaporean my ass !

      • Who Is A Worthy Opposition ?

        The only relevant question is:
        Is Roy speaking the truth?
        – Roy is not PAP
        – no need wayang endorsement from anybody.

  7. landragon123

    There will never be an worthy Opposition for before there started there quarrel and tries to be it leader. First to success as an opposition, it is to pick a leader and let him lead, like LOW. Even his is a successful, he speaks with empathy and does not attack for the purpose of ‘TO ATTACK’. Look at the last parliament, It was the PM who attack him, and IS that the behavior of a PM, yes when he is SICK and cancel?

    • Who Is A Worthy Opposition ?

      /// There will never be an worthy Opposition ///

      Who defines what is a “worthy Opposition” ?
      ANSWER
      —————
      The Straits Times & PAP.

      Who tells you what is a “well qualified politician” ?
      ANSWER
      —————
      The Straits Times & PAP.

      Why don’t you vote for people who will protect Singaporeans instead to represent you in parliament?
      Isn’t it easier than going to a PAP MP for help?
      Do you want to get scolded for having a “subsidy mentality” by a PAP MP?
      If you want dignity, vote Opposition in GE 2016.
      Your elderly parents will thank you.

  8. landragon123

    The next ELECTION will be 2015, and for punter, lets lay a bet and LHL will like it. I go for LHL to leave and an Indian PM to take over. Any punter wants to go and give a better prediction? My odds it 10 to 1 like what people use to say 10 bets only 1 win. Bullshit, 10 gambler, 11 losers. The one loser will usually goes home for money and it is the wife, children ending at that 11 losers. The winner everyone knows it the Casinos Owner and it is Sands or Genting boss. These two men families will suffer for the rest of their live as when you SINNED you future families will take the suffering for you and it can be for generations to come.

    If these owners heels my advise, convert the casinos into THEME parks for Tourist to enjoy with their families, a win win for the Owners and the Governments of their countries. Orlando will be a lesson to learn.

  9. Helen

    PAP wants to keep our CPF money because a few old men lost all their money in Batam.

    So the same logic:
    Singaporeans want our CPF money back because a few of the investments made by Temasek also lost money (e.g. ABC Learning).

  10. banker

    we put our money in the bank . the bank pay us an interest of 2 %. The bank use our savings to invest and lend to others. so the bank should pay us 10 %?

    • paray

      our CPF with a deed for our welfare once we reach age 55
      what is the deed ? — no touch, no change, no postpone , whatever WHO you are !
      but PAP touched it, changed it , postpone it by their single side
      that is an rape !
      if we save it with bank, we can withdraw any time, not until we die still Money in PAP’s hand !
      that is an rape !

  11. landragon123

    All this argument are flaw. The is no way to get your CPF back as it is built into PAP policy and PAP policy are sets in STONE as the WP blogs on LKY mentioned.
    As long as LHL is alive, he will still thinks of ways to keep our money. Maybe our next Indian PM can think of a better solutions. I think he can for his is a Finance man. He now represent Singapore at NY HQ as a second terms at UN.
    Our problems are we are ran by military men who only learn war games at the SAFATI on their computer. and when there retired as army officers and seconded to be the government. What can an army officier in the civil servant do to made Singapore economic up and flying again.

  12. Pingback: [Comic] How Singapooreans are Tricked and Trapped | The Heart Truths
  13. Pingback: [漫画]新加坡人是如何被哄和被套牢的 | The Heart Truths
  14. Pingback: This is What is Wrong in Singapore. Now, are You Willing to See It? | The Heart Truths
  15. Pingback: 这是新加坡的问题所在,您愿意正视它吗? | The Heart Truths
  16. teoenming

    Singapore Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew and Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong Want Teo En Ming Dead

    Singapore Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew and Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong want Teo En Ming dead. Lee Kuan Yew and Lee Hsien Loong want Teo En Ming to die young. I am only 36 years old. I do not want to die young. I want to live to a hundred years old and beyond!!!

    Teo En Ming has filed an official complaint against the Singapore Government at the United Nations Human Rights Council Branch and the International Criminal Court. Read the letter here:

    ***********************************************************************************
    ***********************************************************************************
    ***********************************************************************************
    ***********************************************************************************
    ***********************************************************************************

    Teo En Ming’s Open Letter (Plea for Medical Help/Assistance) to World Leaders dated 27 Aug 2010. Read the letter here:

    http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/mpich-discuss/2010-August/007811.html

    Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
    Singapore Citizen
    Republic of Singapore

  17. Pingback: The Truth about the CPF Advisory Panel’s Recommendations: PAP Never Wanted to Increase Our CPF at All | The Heart Truths
  18. Pingback: A Short Note on Budget 2016 and Update Twelve of Defamation Funds | The Heart Truths

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s